Mobility of Teaching and Research Staff: Determinants and Post Factum Effects

Q2 Social Sciences
Elena-Sabina Turnea, Adriana Prodan, L. Maha, A. G. Andrei
{"title":"Mobility of Teaching and Research Staff: Determinants and Post Factum Effects","authors":"Elena-Sabina Turnea, Adriana Prodan, L. Maha, A. G. Andrei","doi":"10.33788/rcis.79.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports the findings of a study investigating higher education institutions (HEIs) in Romania and the motivations lying behind the decision of undertaking professional mobilities in academia. Although professional mobilities are known to be a frequent practice in various fields of activity, the teaching and research mobilities of academics distinguish themselves among the mobilities of all sectors, deserving a special attention. In this context, our study investigated the incentives and deterrents of undertaking academic mobilities in Romanian HEIs. It divided the determinants of undertaking mobilities into those leading to mobilities and the others slowing them down. Results have shown that the desire of expanding professional experience has the highest influence on teaching and research staff's decision to undertake a mobility, while insufficient funding explains mobilities drop-off, as it is the factor of highest influence on people’s decision of not undertaking mobilities. The study also analysed the mobility post factum implications for the academic community. The development of research networks and career enrichment were the main benefits of academic mobilities indicated by study results. In this sense, most study participants reported that they developed their network to do research during the mobilities and they have also managed to enrich their professional careers thanks to these mobilities.","PeriodicalId":45087,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.79.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a study investigating higher education institutions (HEIs) in Romania and the motivations lying behind the decision of undertaking professional mobilities in academia. Although professional mobilities are known to be a frequent practice in various fields of activity, the teaching and research mobilities of academics distinguish themselves among the mobilities of all sectors, deserving a special attention. In this context, our study investigated the incentives and deterrents of undertaking academic mobilities in Romanian HEIs. It divided the determinants of undertaking mobilities into those leading to mobilities and the others slowing them down. Results have shown that the desire of expanding professional experience has the highest influence on teaching and research staff's decision to undertake a mobility, while insufficient funding explains mobilities drop-off, as it is the factor of highest influence on people’s decision of not undertaking mobilities. The study also analysed the mobility post factum implications for the academic community. The development of research networks and career enrichment were the main benefits of academic mobilities indicated by study results. In this sense, most study participants reported that they developed their network to do research during the mobilities and they have also managed to enrich their professional careers thanks to these mobilities.
教学和科研人员的流动性:决定因素和事后效应
本文报道了一项调查罗马尼亚高等教育机构(HEI)的研究结果,以及在学术界进行专业流动的决定背后的动机。尽管众所周知,专业流动性在各个活动领域都是一种常见的做法,但学术界的教学和研究流动性在所有部门的流动性中脱颖而出,值得特别关注。在此背景下,我们的研究调查了罗马尼亚高等教育机构开展学术流动的动机和威慑因素。它将进行流动性的决定因素分为导致流动性的因素和减缓流动性的其他因素。研究结果表明,扩大专业经验的愿望对教学和研究人员进行流动的决定影响最大,而资金不足解释了流动性下降的原因,因为这是对人们不进行流动决定影响最大的因素。该研究还分析了流动性对学术界的事后影响。研究结果表明,研究网络的发展和职业生涯的丰富是学术流动的主要好处。从这个意义上说,大多数研究参与者报告说,他们在流动期间发展了自己的网络来进行研究,而且由于这些流动,他们也成功地丰富了自己的职业生涯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala
Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信