Estimate of Patients With Missed Seizures Because of Delay in Conventional EEG.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-05 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000000957
Safoora Fatima, Parimala Velpula Krishnamurthy, Mengzhen Sun, Mariel Kalkach Aparicio, Klevest Gjini, Aaron F Struck
{"title":"Estimate of Patients With Missed Seizures Because of Delay in Conventional EEG.","authors":"Safoora Fatima, Parimala Velpula Krishnamurthy, Mengzhen Sun, Mariel Kalkach Aparicio, Klevest Gjini, Aaron F Struck","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000000957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is frequent delay between ordering and placement of conventional EEG. Here we estimate how many patients had seizures during this delay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred fifty consecutive adult patients who underwent conventional EEG monitoring at the University of Wisconsin Hospital were retrospectively chart reviewed for demographics, time of EEG order, clinical and other EEG-related information. Patients were stratified by use of anti-seizure medications before EEG and into low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups based on 2HELPS2B score (0, 1, or >1). Monte Carlo simulations (500 trials) were performed to estimate seizures during delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median delay from EEG order to performing EEG was 2.00 hours (range of 0.5-8.00 hours) in the total cohort. For EEGs ordered after-hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-8.00 hours), and during business hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-6.00 hours). The place of EEG, intensive care unit, emergency department, and general floor, did not show significant difference (P = 0.84). Anti-seizure medication did not affect time to first seizure in the low-risk (P = 0.37), medium-risk (P = 0.44), or high-risk (P = 0.12) groups. The estimated % of patients who had a seizure in the delay period for low-risk group (2HELPS2B = 0) was 0.8%, for the medium-risk group (2HELPS2B = 1) was 10.3%, and for the high-risk group (2HELPS2B > 1) was 17.6%, and overall risk was 7.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The University of Wisconsin Hospital with 24-hour in-house EEG technologists has a median delay of 2 hours from order to start of EEG, shorter than published reports from other centers. Nonetheless, seizures were likely missed in about 7.2% of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is frequent delay between ordering and placement of conventional EEG. Here we estimate how many patients had seizures during this delay.

Methods: Two hundred fifty consecutive adult patients who underwent conventional EEG monitoring at the University of Wisconsin Hospital were retrospectively chart reviewed for demographics, time of EEG order, clinical and other EEG-related information. Patients were stratified by use of anti-seizure medications before EEG and into low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups based on 2HELPS2B score (0, 1, or >1). Monte Carlo simulations (500 trials) were performed to estimate seizures during delay.

Results: The median delay from EEG order to performing EEG was 2.00 hours (range of 0.5-8.00 hours) in the total cohort. For EEGs ordered after-hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-8.00 hours), and during business hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-6.00 hours). The place of EEG, intensive care unit, emergency department, and general floor, did not show significant difference (P = 0.84). Anti-seizure medication did not affect time to first seizure in the low-risk (P = 0.37), medium-risk (P = 0.44), or high-risk (P = 0.12) groups. The estimated % of patients who had a seizure in the delay period for low-risk group (2HELPS2B = 0) was 0.8%, for the medium-risk group (2HELPS2B = 1) was 10.3%, and for the high-risk group (2HELPS2B > 1) was 17.6%, and overall risk was 7.2%.

Conclusions: The University of Wisconsin Hospital with 24-hour in-house EEG technologists has a median delay of 2 hours from order to start of EEG, shorter than published reports from other centers. Nonetheless, seizures were likely missed in about 7.2% of patients.

因常规脑电图延迟而错过癫痫发作患者的评估
目的:常规脑电图从下单到放置之间经常出现延迟。在此,我们估算了有多少患者在这一延迟期间癫痫发作:我们对威斯康星大学医院连续接受常规脑电图监测的 250 名成年患者进行了病历回顾,以了解其人口统计学特征、下达脑电图指令的时间、临床及其他与脑电图相关的信息。根据脑电图前抗癫痫药物的使用情况对患者进行分层,并根据 2HELPS2B 评分(0、1 或 >1)将患者分为低风险组、中风险组和高风险组。进行蒙特卡罗模拟(500 次试验)以估计延迟期间的癫痫发作情况:从下达脑电图指令到进行脑电图检查的中位延迟时间为 2.00 小时(范围为 0.5-8.00 小时)。下班后下达脑电图指令的延迟时间为 2.00 小时(范围为 0.5-8.00 小时),上班时间为 2.00 小时(范围为 0.5-6.00 小时)。脑电图检查地点、重症监护室、急诊科和普通楼层没有明显差异(P = 0.84)。抗癫痫药物对低风险组(P = 0.37)、中风险组(P = 0.44)和高风险组(P = 0.12)的首次癫痫发作时间没有影响。据估计,低风险组(2HELPS2B = 0)在延迟期内发作的患者比例为 0.8%,中风险组(2HELPS2B = 1)为 10.3%,高风险组(2HELPS2B > 1)为 17.6%,总体风险为 7.2%:威斯康星大学附属医院拥有 24 小时的内部脑电图技师,从下订单到开始脑电图检查的中位延迟时间为 2 小时,短于其他中心的公开报告。尽管如此,仍有约 7.2% 的患者可能错过了癫痫发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信