Analisis Perbandingan Kesentralan Graf Dengan Degree, Eigenvector, dan Beta Centrality

Valerie ​Valerie, H. Napitupulu, E. Carnia
{"title":"Analisis Perbandingan Kesentralan Graf Dengan Degree, Eigenvector, dan Beta Centrality","authors":"Valerie ​Valerie, H. Napitupulu, E. Carnia","doi":"10.24198/jmi.v18.n1.36164.91-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of graph centrality in assessing the most central vertex in a graph or the most central or important individual in a network has been a prosperous field of exploration these days. Centrality observation in graphs is suitable for any graph with various kinds of centrality methods to be applied to many fields. In this study, simple, regular, directed and signed graph are being assessed by Degree, Eigenvector, and Beta Centrality. These three methods are related to each other; therefore, it is interesting to study the relation and the characteristic of each method. According to the result, Degree Centrality which assesses centrality based on vertexs direct links is applicable for every graph in this study. On the other hand, Eigenvector Centrality which asses a vertex centrality with respect to its neighbors centrality, is not applicable for the acyclic directed tree. While Beta Centrality is also advantageous for every graph in this study, the use of parameter β affects centrality scores depending on how the measure is conducted for local or global structure. Beta Centrality is an alternative to observing a vertexs centrality score by considering its direct links centrality, in the acyclic directed tree.","PeriodicalId":53096,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Matematika Integratif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Matematika Integratif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v18.n1.36164.91-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of graph centrality in assessing the most central vertex in a graph or the most central or important individual in a network has been a prosperous field of exploration these days. Centrality observation in graphs is suitable for any graph with various kinds of centrality methods to be applied to many fields. In this study, simple, regular, directed and signed graph are being assessed by Degree, Eigenvector, and Beta Centrality. These three methods are related to each other; therefore, it is interesting to study the relation and the characteristic of each method. According to the result, Degree Centrality which assesses centrality based on vertexs direct links is applicable for every graph in this study. On the other hand, Eigenvector Centrality which asses a vertex centrality with respect to its neighbors centrality, is not applicable for the acyclic directed tree. While Beta Centrality is also advantageous for every graph in this study, the use of parameter β affects centrality scores depending on how the measure is conducted for local or global structure. Beta Centrality is an alternative to observing a vertexs centrality score by considering its direct links centrality, in the acyclic directed tree.
近年来,在评估图中最中心的顶点或网络中最中心或最重要的个体时,对图中心性的研究一直是一个繁荣的探索领域。图中的中心性观察适用于任何具有各种中心性方法的图,可应用于许多领域。在这项研究中,简单图、正则图、有向图和有符号图被用度、特征向量和贝塔中心性来评估。这三种方法是相互关联的;因此,研究每种方法的关系和特点是很有意思的。结果表明,基于顶点直接链接评估中心性的度中心性适用于本研究中的每个图。另一方面,特征向量中心性(Eigenvector Centrality)评估顶点相对于其邻居中心性的中心性,不适用于非循环有向树。虽然β中心性对本研究中的每个图都是有利的,但参数β的使用会影响中心性得分,这取决于如何对局部或全局结构进行测量。贝塔中心性是通过考虑非循环有向树中的直接链接中心性来观察顶点中心性得分的一种替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信