Slim Chance for Permanent Weight Loss

E. Rothblum
{"title":"Slim Chance for Permanent Weight Loss","authors":"E. Rothblum","doi":"10.1037/arc0000043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1950s, health and mental health professionals have criticized the conventional wisdom that people can lose weight and keep it off. Weight loss programs have high dropout rates and rarely have participants move from “clinical” to “normal” weights, and the overwhelming majority of people who lose even 5–10% of body weight have regained it 1 year later. The present article reviews some challenges in the weight loss research and provides some possible reasons why psychologists continue to uphold the conventional wisdom that permanent weight loss is possible. S C I E N T I F I C A B S T R A C T Since the 1950s, health and mental health professionals have criticized the conventional wisdom that permanent weight loss is possible. Clinical trials on weight loss have high dropout rates and rarely have participants move from “clinical” to “normal” body mass index levels, and the overwhelming majority of people who lose even 5–10% of body weight have regained it 1 year later. The present article reviews some methodological issues in the weight loss literature and provides some possible reasons why psychologists continue to uphold the conventional wisdom that permanent weight loss is possible.","PeriodicalId":89891,"journal":{"name":"Archives of scientific psychology","volume":"6 1","pages":"63–69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of scientific psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Since the 1950s, health and mental health professionals have criticized the conventional wisdom that people can lose weight and keep it off. Weight loss programs have high dropout rates and rarely have participants move from “clinical” to “normal” weights, and the overwhelming majority of people who lose even 5–10% of body weight have regained it 1 year later. The present article reviews some challenges in the weight loss research and provides some possible reasons why psychologists continue to uphold the conventional wisdom that permanent weight loss is possible. S C I E N T I F I C A B S T R A C T Since the 1950s, health and mental health professionals have criticized the conventional wisdom that permanent weight loss is possible. Clinical trials on weight loss have high dropout rates and rarely have participants move from “clinical” to “normal” body mass index levels, and the overwhelming majority of people who lose even 5–10% of body weight have regained it 1 year later. The present article reviews some methodological issues in the weight loss literature and provides some possible reasons why psychologists continue to uphold the conventional wisdom that permanent weight loss is possible.
永久减肥机会渺茫
自20世纪50年代以来,健康和心理健康专业人士一直批评人们可以减肥并保持体重的传统观点。减肥项目的辍学率很高,参与者很少从“临床”体重转变为“正常”体重,绝大多数体重减轻了5-10%的人在一年后又恢复了体重。本文回顾了减肥研究中的一些挑战,并提供了一些可能的原因,为什么心理学家继续坚持传统观点,即永久减肥是可能的。S C I E N T I F I C A B S T R A C T自20世纪50年代以来,健康和心理健康专业人士一直批评传统观点,即永久减肥是可能的。减肥临床试验的辍学率很高,参与者很少从“临床”体重指数水平转变为“正常”体重指数,绝大多数体重减轻了5-10%的人在一年后又恢复了体重。本文回顾了减肥文献中的一些方法论问题,并提供了一些可能的原因,为什么心理学家继续坚持传统观点,即永久减肥是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书