INTERVENTIONS TO ASSESS AND ADDRESS THE SELF-EFFICACY OF MARKETING STUDENTS TOWARD ACQUIRING ANALYTICAL SKILLS

Q2 Social Sciences
Ann Veeck, Zahir A. Quareshi, Kelley O'Reilly, A. Mumuni, Amy MacMillan, Zahida Luqmani, M. Luqmani, Hu Xie
{"title":"INTERVENTIONS TO ASSESS AND ADDRESS THE SELF-EFFICACY OF MARKETING STUDENTS TOWARD ACQUIRING ANALYTICAL SKILLS","authors":"Ann Veeck, Zahir A. Quareshi, Kelley O'Reilly, A. Mumuni, Amy MacMillan, Zahida Luqmani, M. Luqmani, Hu Xie","doi":"10.1080/10528008.2022.2112533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Marketing graduates with analytical skills are in high demand but many marketing majors lack confidence in working with quantitative material. More guidance is needed to address how to support the self-efficacy of marketing students in acquiring analytical skills. We identify three independent types of confidence that relate to the development of analytical skills: confidence in natural ability, confidence in ability to learn, and confidence in current skills. We then provide the results of a two-phase survey, in which students rated an inventory of interventions designed to nurture and advance analytical capabilities. The results suggest that many of the preferences for interventions differ according to confidence level and type of confidence. For example, students with high confidence in their natural ability are more welcoming of opportunities for self-paced studies, while students with lower confidence in their natural ability are more likely to value using additional in-class time to practice quantitative problems. Overall, the findings indicate that quantitative marketing courses should offer multiple approaches for increasing students’ self-efficacy with analytics skills to reach diverse student segments, while using more uniform teaching approaches for valued interventions that do not significantly differ among student groups in terms of perceived helpfulness.","PeriodicalId":37208,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Education Review","volume":"33 1","pages":"211 - 225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2022.2112533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Marketing graduates with analytical skills are in high demand but many marketing majors lack confidence in working with quantitative material. More guidance is needed to address how to support the self-efficacy of marketing students in acquiring analytical skills. We identify three independent types of confidence that relate to the development of analytical skills: confidence in natural ability, confidence in ability to learn, and confidence in current skills. We then provide the results of a two-phase survey, in which students rated an inventory of interventions designed to nurture and advance analytical capabilities. The results suggest that many of the preferences for interventions differ according to confidence level and type of confidence. For example, students with high confidence in their natural ability are more welcoming of opportunities for self-paced studies, while students with lower confidence in their natural ability are more likely to value using additional in-class time to practice quantitative problems. Overall, the findings indicate that quantitative marketing courses should offer multiple approaches for increasing students’ self-efficacy with analytics skills to reach diverse student segments, while using more uniform teaching approaches for valued interventions that do not significantly differ among student groups in terms of perceived helpfulness.
评估和解决市场营销专业学生获得分析技能的自我效能感的干预措施
摘要具有分析能力的市场营销专业毕业生需求量很大,但许多市场营销专业的毕业生对使用定量材料缺乏信心。需要更多的指导来解决如何支持市场营销学生在获得分析技能方面的自我效能感。我们确定了与分析技能发展相关的三种独立类型的信心:对天生能力的信心、对学习能力的信心和对当前技能的信心。然后,我们提供了一项分两阶段的调查结果,学生们对旨在培养和提高分析能力的干预措施进行了评分。研究结果表明,许多干预措施的偏好因信心水平和信心类型而异。例如,对自己的自然能力有高度信心的学生更欢迎自主学习的机会,而对自己的天生能力有较低信心的学生更有可能利用额外的课堂时间练习定量问题。总体而言,研究结果表明,定量营销课程应提供多种方法,通过分析技能提高学生的自我效能,以接触不同的学生群体,同时使用更统一的教学方法进行有价值的干预,这些干预在学生群体的帮助感方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marketing Education Review
Marketing Education Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书