Form, Content, and Space: Methodological Challenges in the Study of Medieval and Early Modern European Graffiti

IF 0.3 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
M. Trentin
{"title":"Form, Content, and Space: Methodological Challenges in the Study of Medieval and Early Modern European Graffiti","authors":"M. Trentin","doi":"10.14324/111.444.2041-9015.1283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars of variousdisciplines have focused their attention on European Medieval and Early Modern graffitiduring the last decade, thus confirming and reinforcing the value of thispeculiar written evidence. Their contributions demonstrate that graffiti canoffer valuable information to different fields of study (e.g. shipbuilding,palaeography, history, social culture, and visual culture) through a glimpseinto past daily life. Due to their nature, graffiti present a completely freegraphic expression, which may appear in either textual or pictorial forms, orboth. This characteristic makes their study rather challenging due to the twodifferent mechanisms of communication they employ. In the case of textualgraffiti, the content is transmitted through linguistic codification, whilepictorial graffiti require a decoding process that is more complex andarticulated. The first challenge, though, is to find a way to record andcompare both evidence on the same graphic and verbal levels.  Furthermore, as for any other epigraphicevidence, the graffiti analysis must take into account the writing surfaces andthe context, two elements that are fundamental for the final interpretation ofthis source. This paper will address these methodological issues concerning thepreliminary phase of graffiti documentation and classification/cataloguing. Thestarting point has been the recent debate and application of FAIR dataprinciples in the field of Humanities, which aim to create quality data, easilyexchanged in a digital environment, fostering knowledge in the field. Sincethis approach has not yet been applied to graffiti studies, the paper aims tostimulate a dialogue on innovative and objective methodological approacheswithin the researchers’ community.","PeriodicalId":30238,"journal":{"name":"Papers from the Institute of Archaeology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers from the Institute of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2041-9015.1283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Scholars of variousdisciplines have focused their attention on European Medieval and Early Modern graffitiduring the last decade, thus confirming and reinforcing the value of thispeculiar written evidence. Their contributions demonstrate that graffiti canoffer valuable information to different fields of study (e.g. shipbuilding,palaeography, history, social culture, and visual culture) through a glimpseinto past daily life. Due to their nature, graffiti present a completely freegraphic expression, which may appear in either textual or pictorial forms, orboth. This characteristic makes their study rather challenging due to the twodifferent mechanisms of communication they employ. In the case of textualgraffiti, the content is transmitted through linguistic codification, whilepictorial graffiti require a decoding process that is more complex andarticulated. The first challenge, though, is to find a way to record andcompare both evidence on the same graphic and verbal levels.  Furthermore, as for any other epigraphicevidence, the graffiti analysis must take into account the writing surfaces andthe context, two elements that are fundamental for the final interpretation ofthis source. This paper will address these methodological issues concerning thepreliminary phase of graffiti documentation and classification/cataloguing. Thestarting point has been the recent debate and application of FAIR dataprinciples in the field of Humanities, which aim to create quality data, easilyexchanged in a digital environment, fostering knowledge in the field. Sincethis approach has not yet been applied to graffiti studies, the paper aims tostimulate a dialogue on innovative and objective methodological approacheswithin the researchers’ community.
形式、内容和空间:中世纪和早期现代欧洲涂鸦研究中的方法论挑战
在过去的十年里,各个学科的学者都把注意力集中在欧洲中世纪和早期现代的涂鸦上,从而确认和加强了这种独特的书面证据的价值。他们的贡献表明,涂鸦可以通过对过去日常生活的一瞥,为不同的研究领域(如造船、古生物学、历史、社会文化和视觉文化)提供有价值的信息。由于其性质,涂鸦呈现出一种完全自由的表达方式,可能以文字形式出现,也可能以图画形式出现,或者两者兼而有之。由于他们采用的两种不同的交流机制,这一特点使他们的研究颇具挑战性。在文本涂鸦的情况下,内容是通过语言编纂来传播的,而史诗涂鸦则需要一个更复杂、更清晰的解码过程。然而,第一个挑战是找到一种方法,在相同的图像和语言水平上记录和比较这两种证据。此外,对于任何其他铭文证据,涂鸦分析必须考虑到书写表面和上下文,这两个因素是对这一来源的最终解释的基础。本文将解决这些关于涂鸦文档和分类/编目的初步阶段的方法学问题。起点是最近在人文领域对FAIR数据原则的辩论和应用,其目的是创建高质量的数据,易于在数字环境中交换,促进该领域的知识。由于这种方法尚未应用于涂鸦研究,本文旨在激发研究人员社区内关于创新和客观的方法方法的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信