Young geniuses versus old masters: Two different trajectories of individual knowledge bases in the innovation process

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Siwei Zhu, Baris Morkan, Zhipeng Yan
{"title":"Young geniuses versus old masters: Two different trajectories of individual knowledge bases in the innovation process","authors":"Siwei Zhu,&nbsp;Baris Morkan,&nbsp;Zhipeng Yan","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge depth and knowledge breadth, the two dimensions of individual knowledge bases, are the most fundamental sources of innovation. Following a mixed-method approach, we collect data from top chemical scientists in the R&amp;D department of a leading US oil and gas company and investigate how individuals leverage their knowledge bases in the innovation process. In the qualitative study, we develop a conceptual framework with the two-stage innovation process and label two distinct groups of individuals as “Young Geniuses” with high knowledge depth and “Old Masters” with high knowledge breadth. In the quantitative study, our analysis shows two different trajectories toward the innovation process: the negative impact of knowledge depth on early stage knowledge combinations for Young Geniuses occurs extremely early; the diminishing return of knowledge breadth on late-stage commercialization for Old Masters occurs very late. Our study further analyzes the interaction effect of knowledge breadth for knowledge depth and provides practical implications for managers; in particular, inventors who better comprehend the timing of switching knowledge development can navigate the innovation process to achieve fruitful outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"55-64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge depth and knowledge breadth, the two dimensions of individual knowledge bases, are the most fundamental sources of innovation. Following a mixed-method approach, we collect data from top chemical scientists in the R&D department of a leading US oil and gas company and investigate how individuals leverage their knowledge bases in the innovation process. In the qualitative study, we develop a conceptual framework with the two-stage innovation process and label two distinct groups of individuals as “Young Geniuses” with high knowledge depth and “Old Masters” with high knowledge breadth. In the quantitative study, our analysis shows two different trajectories toward the innovation process: the negative impact of knowledge depth on early stage knowledge combinations for Young Geniuses occurs extremely early; the diminishing return of knowledge breadth on late-stage commercialization for Old Masters occurs very late. Our study further analyzes the interaction effect of knowledge breadth for knowledge depth and provides practical implications for managers; in particular, inventors who better comprehend the timing of switching knowledge development can navigate the innovation process to achieve fruitful outcomes.

年轻天才与老大师:创新过程中个人知识基础的两种不同轨迹
知识深度和知识广度是个体知识基础的两个维度,是创新最根本的源泉。采用混合方法,我们从美国一家领先的石油和天然气公司的研发部门的顶级化学科学家那里收集数据,并调查个人如何在创新过程中利用他们的知识基础。在定性研究中,我们建立了一个包含两阶段创新过程的概念框架,并将两个不同的个体群体标记为具有高知识深度的“青年天才”和具有高知识广度的“老大师”。在定量研究中,我们的分析显示了两种不同的创新过程轨迹:知识深度对青年天才早期知识组合的负面影响发生得非常早;早期大师作品后期商业化中知识广度的递减回报出现得很晚。本研究进一步分析了知识广度对知识深度的交互作用,为管理者提供了实践启示;特别是,更好地理解知识发展转换时机的发明者可以驾驭创新过程,取得丰硕成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信