Skepticism, Gratitude, and the Neoliberal Narrative: TFA Teachers’ Conceptualization of Occupational Stature

Q2 Social Sciences
Angela Kraemer-Holland
{"title":"Skepticism, Gratitude, and the Neoliberal Narrative: TFA Teachers’ Conceptualization of Occupational Stature","authors":"Angela Kraemer-Holland","doi":"10.1080/01626620.2020.1825239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article highlights the capacity of both neoliberal discourse and Teach for America (TFA) in shaping how emergent TFA teachers frame teaching with regard to occupational esteem, occupational status, and occupational prestige. Relevant literature explores the evolution of teaching and teacher preparation in light of neoliberalism, and the organizational structure and positioning of TFA. Qualitative phenomenological interviews focused on participants’ initial educational experiences, TFA participation, and the impact of their experiences on their overall conceptions of teaching. Findings illuminated participants’ concerns over entering teaching due to its seemingly lower occupational stature that TFA would allegedly alleviate, as well as participants’ growing reverence for teaching upon departure, reverence attributed to their teaching experiences irrespective of TFA. This research exposes how TFA and neoliberalism shape our understanding of teaching, and calls our attention to how we can elevate the teaching profession amid a neoliberal discourse that threatens its existence.","PeriodicalId":52183,"journal":{"name":"Action in Teacher Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"430 - 446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01626620.2020.1825239","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action in Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2020.1825239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article highlights the capacity of both neoliberal discourse and Teach for America (TFA) in shaping how emergent TFA teachers frame teaching with regard to occupational esteem, occupational status, and occupational prestige. Relevant literature explores the evolution of teaching and teacher preparation in light of neoliberalism, and the organizational structure and positioning of TFA. Qualitative phenomenological interviews focused on participants’ initial educational experiences, TFA participation, and the impact of their experiences on their overall conceptions of teaching. Findings illuminated participants’ concerns over entering teaching due to its seemingly lower occupational stature that TFA would allegedly alleviate, as well as participants’ growing reverence for teaching upon departure, reverence attributed to their teaching experiences irrespective of TFA. This research exposes how TFA and neoliberalism shape our understanding of teaching, and calls our attention to how we can elevate the teaching profession amid a neoliberal discourse that threatens its existence.
怀疑、感激与新自由主义叙事:TFA教师对职业地位的概念化
本文强调了新自由主义话语和“为美国而教”(TFA)在塑造新兴TFA教师如何根据职业尊重、职业地位和职业声望来构建教学框架方面的能力。相关文献探讨了新自由主义背景下教学和教师准备的演变,以及TFA的组织结构和定位。定性现象学访谈主要关注参与者的初始教育经历、TFA参与以及他们的经历对他们整体教学观念的影响。研究结果阐明了参与者对进入教学行业的担忧,因为TFA似乎可以缓解其职业地位较低的问题,以及参与者在离开后对教学的日益敬畏,这种敬畏归因于他们的教学经历,而与TFA无关。本研究揭示了TFA和新自由主义如何塑造我们对教学的理解,并呼吁我们注意如何在威胁其存在的新自由主义话语中提升教学专业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Action in Teacher Education
Action in Teacher Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信