Modernism’s “Doors of Perception”: From Ezra Pound’s Ideogrammic Method to Marshall Mcluhan’s “Mosaic”

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Panayiotes T. Tryphonopoulos, D. Tryphonopoulos
{"title":"Modernism’s “Doors of Perception”: From Ezra Pound’s Ideogrammic Method to Marshall Mcluhan’s “Mosaic”","authors":"Panayiotes T. Tryphonopoulos, D. Tryphonopoulos","doi":"10.22455/2541-7894-2019-7-377-393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing to Ezra Pound in May 1948, Marshall McLuhan told the poet that, “we [that is, Hugh Kenner and I] have long taken a serious interest [in] your work.” And so, McLuhan along with Kenner visited Pound at St Elizabeths in June 1948. The rest makes for interesting modernist literary and cultural studies history. This paper argues that McLuhan’s method of composition, which he called a “mosaic,” derives from his understanding of Pound’s poetics of the ideogrammic method. In The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man (1962), McLuhan explains that the book “develops a mosaic or field approach to its problems. Such a mosaic image of numerous data and quotations in evidence offers the only practical means of revealing the causal operations in history.” McLuhan learned much from the American poet, including to view literature/pedagogy as “training of perception”; and both developed texts that placed readers in media res, encouraging an heuristic approach to “reading” whereby readers are empowered to arrive at their own meaning or interpretation irrespective of the writers’ ideology and/or agenda. Using examples from The Cantos and The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects (1967), this essay also probes the relationships between modernist aesthetics, technological prophesy and sociopolitical praxis.","PeriodicalId":34458,"journal":{"name":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatura dvukh Amerik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2019-7-377-393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Writing to Ezra Pound in May 1948, Marshall McLuhan told the poet that, “we [that is, Hugh Kenner and I] have long taken a serious interest [in] your work.” And so, McLuhan along with Kenner visited Pound at St Elizabeths in June 1948. The rest makes for interesting modernist literary and cultural studies history. This paper argues that McLuhan’s method of composition, which he called a “mosaic,” derives from his understanding of Pound’s poetics of the ideogrammic method. In The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man (1962), McLuhan explains that the book “develops a mosaic or field approach to its problems. Such a mosaic image of numerous data and quotations in evidence offers the only practical means of revealing the causal operations in history.” McLuhan learned much from the American poet, including to view literature/pedagogy as “training of perception”; and both developed texts that placed readers in media res, encouraging an heuristic approach to “reading” whereby readers are empowered to arrive at their own meaning or interpretation irrespective of the writers’ ideology and/or agenda. Using examples from The Cantos and The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects (1967), this essay also probes the relationships between modernist aesthetics, technological prophesy and sociopolitical praxis.
现代主义的“感知之门”:从庞德的表意法到麦克卢汉的“马赛克”
1948年5月,马歇尔·麦克卢汉在给庞德的信中告诉这位诗人,“我们(也就是休·肯纳和我)长期以来对你的作品非常感兴趣。”因此,1948年6月,麦克卢汉和肯纳在圣伊丽莎白教堂拜访了庞德。其余的则是有趣的现代主义文学和文化研究史。本文认为,麦克卢汉的创作方法,他称之为“马赛克”,源于他对庞德表意方法诗学的理解。在《古腾堡星系:打字人的形成》(1962)一书中,麦克鲁汉解释说,这本书“发展了一种马赛克或实地的方法来解决它的问题。这种由大量数据和引文组成的马赛克图像提供了揭示历史上因果关系的唯一实用手段。”麦克鲁汉从这位美国诗人那里学到了很多,包括将文学/教育学视为“感知的训练”;两者都发展了将读者置于媒介中的文本,鼓励采用启发式的“阅读”方法,使读者能够获得自己的意义或解释,而不考虑作者的意识形态和/或议程。本文还以《康托斯》和《媒介是按摩:效果清单》(1967)为例,探讨了现代主义美学、技术预言和社会政治实践之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信