Closing the Gaps in US Rocket Propellant Production, 1940–1945

IF 0.2 Q2 HISTORY
Vulcan Pub Date : 2020-12-18 DOI:10.1163/22134603-08010003
Yoel Bergman
{"title":"Closing the Gaps in US Rocket Propellant Production, 1940–1945","authors":"Yoel Bergman","doi":"10.1163/22134603-08010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe article supplements and revises past historiographical explanations on why the US entered World War ii without propellant based engines, for tactical rockets and how that gap was overcome. Short range rockets were used extensively by all sides in the War for various purposes, but in the interwar period (1919–1939), rocket advances were made mostly in Europe with the US lagging behind. The rockets engines were based on solid propellant tubes, but in 1940 there was hardly any US tubes design knowledge and no production facilities. Technological and production gaps had to be closed, and from 1940 were made with a significant help from Britain and under the leadership of the civilian National Defense Research Council (ndrc) agency, merged in 1941 into the Office of Scientific Research and Development (osrd). Due to the pressing needs to equip American forces with rockets, a joint group of ndrc and Army developers modified in early 1942 an existing gun propellant production technology for rocket tubes. Used initially for the Bazooka this adoption was found later to be extremely problematic in production and performance of tubes in the widely-used, Army’s 4.5-inch barrage and fighter plane rockets. Working in parallel, a joint group of ndrc and navy developers was able to construct the more modern tube production process already used abroad, avoiding the main army difficulties and taking the lead. The growing needs for these superior Navy rockets, some of which were used extensively by the Army, led to gaps between supplies and demands by 1943. Two fortunate events, one of them connected with the Soviet Union, helped to relieve the shortage.","PeriodicalId":36324,"journal":{"name":"Vulcan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vulcan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134603-08010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article supplements and revises past historiographical explanations on why the US entered World War ii without propellant based engines, for tactical rockets and how that gap was overcome. Short range rockets were used extensively by all sides in the War for various purposes, but in the interwar period (1919–1939), rocket advances were made mostly in Europe with the US lagging behind. The rockets engines were based on solid propellant tubes, but in 1940 there was hardly any US tubes design knowledge and no production facilities. Technological and production gaps had to be closed, and from 1940 were made with a significant help from Britain and under the leadership of the civilian National Defense Research Council (ndrc) agency, merged in 1941 into the Office of Scientific Research and Development (osrd). Due to the pressing needs to equip American forces with rockets, a joint group of ndrc and Army developers modified in early 1942 an existing gun propellant production technology for rocket tubes. Used initially for the Bazooka this adoption was found later to be extremely problematic in production and performance of tubes in the widely-used, Army’s 4.5-inch barrage and fighter plane rockets. Working in parallel, a joint group of ndrc and navy developers was able to construct the more modern tube production process already used abroad, avoiding the main army difficulties and taking the lead. The growing needs for these superior Navy rockets, some of which were used extensively by the Army, led to gaps between supplies and demands by 1943. Two fortunate events, one of them connected with the Soviet Union, helped to relieve the shortage.
缩小美国火箭推进剂生产的差距,1940-1945
这篇文章补充和修正了过去关于美国为什么在没有战术火箭推进剂发动机的情况下参加第二次世界大战以及如何克服这一差距的历史解释。短程火箭在战争中被各方广泛用于各种目的,但在两次世界大战期间(1919年至1939年),火箭的发展主要在欧洲进行,美国落后。火箭发动机是基于固体推进剂管,但在1940年,几乎没有任何美国管的设计知识,也没有生产设施。技术和生产差距必须缩小,从1940年起,在英国的大力帮助下,在民用国防研究委员会(ndrc)的领导下,国防研究委员会于1941年并入科学研究与发展办公室(osrd)。由于迫切需要为美国军队配备火箭,国防部和陆军开发人员组成的联合小组于1942年初修改了现有的火箭管推进剂生产技术。最初用于巴祖卡,后来发现这种采用在广泛使用的陆军4.5英寸弹幕和战斗机火箭的管的生产和性能方面存在极大问题。通过并行工作,一个由ndrc和海军开发人员组成的联合小组能够构建出已经在国外使用的更现代化的管材生产工艺,避免了军队的主要困难,并发挥了带头作用。对这些高级海军火箭的需求不断增长,其中一些被陆军广泛使用,导致1943年出现供需缺口。两个幸运的事件,其中一个与苏联有关,帮助缓解了短缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vulcan
Vulcan Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信