The nonlinear analysis of reactive powder concrete effectiveness in shear for reinforced concrete deep beams

IF 1.5 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Jaafar, M. M. Yussof, A. A. Azeez, T. M. Mezher, Abrahem A. Ali Blash
{"title":"The nonlinear analysis of reactive powder concrete effectiveness in shear for reinforced concrete deep beams","authors":"A. Jaafar, M. M. Yussof, A. A. Azeez, T. M. Mezher, Abrahem A. Ali Blash","doi":"10.1515/eng-2022-0412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this article is to investigate the effect of using reactive powder concrete (RPC) for reinforcement concrete deep beams (CDBs) to study the shear effect by the numerical analysis. The method of finite element analysis model simulations using a program was used. The characteristics of RPC and the deep beam of reinforced concrete were obtained from previous scientific research. Non-linear analysis for two models of deep beams, one with RPC and the other without using it, was conducted to compare with experimental results from recent tests of deep concrete beams with RPC and loaded until failure. The data obtained from the specimens have many factors related to the effect of the strength and action of reinforcement CDBs such as shear load deflection, crack pattern, mode failure, and concrete strength. On the other hand, the mesh changing was investigated in terms of the maximum concrete strength and the running time by changing the mesh size to 50, 25, and 15. Models were simulated with a two-point load using a shear span-to-depth with an av/d ratio of 0.77. The difference in percentage deflection between the numerical and experimental models’ data was observed at 2.60 and 5.9% for concrete deep beam and RPC deep beam, respectively, and the maximum shear load was 2.27 and 5.40%. The importance of the outputs of this article lies in bridging the research gap of this new topic and identifying the shear behavior of deep beams reinforced with RPC due to the lack of research related to this topic. It was noted that the obtained data for finite element analysis are very consistent with the previous laboratory scientific research, while the error rate did not exceed 10%.","PeriodicalId":19512,"journal":{"name":"Open Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2022-0412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this article is to investigate the effect of using reactive powder concrete (RPC) for reinforcement concrete deep beams (CDBs) to study the shear effect by the numerical analysis. The method of finite element analysis model simulations using a program was used. The characteristics of RPC and the deep beam of reinforced concrete were obtained from previous scientific research. Non-linear analysis for two models of deep beams, one with RPC and the other without using it, was conducted to compare with experimental results from recent tests of deep concrete beams with RPC and loaded until failure. The data obtained from the specimens have many factors related to the effect of the strength and action of reinforcement CDBs such as shear load deflection, crack pattern, mode failure, and concrete strength. On the other hand, the mesh changing was investigated in terms of the maximum concrete strength and the running time by changing the mesh size to 50, 25, and 15. Models were simulated with a two-point load using a shear span-to-depth with an av/d ratio of 0.77. The difference in percentage deflection between the numerical and experimental models’ data was observed at 2.60 and 5.9% for concrete deep beam and RPC deep beam, respectively, and the maximum shear load was 2.27 and 5.40%. The importance of the outputs of this article lies in bridging the research gap of this new topic and identifying the shear behavior of deep beams reinforced with RPC due to the lack of research related to this topic. It was noted that the obtained data for finite element analysis are very consistent with the previous laboratory scientific research, while the error rate did not exceed 10%.
活性粉末混凝土深梁抗剪性能的非线性分析
摘要本文旨在通过数值分析研究活性粉末混凝土(RPC)用于钢筋混凝土深梁(CDBs)的剪切效应。使用有限元分析方法,使用程序对模型进行模拟。RPC和钢筋混凝土深梁的特性是通过以往的科学研究获得的。对两种深梁模型(一种使用RPC,另一种不使用RPC)进行了非线性分析,以与最近使用RPC并加载至失效的深混凝土梁的试验结果进行比较。从试件中获得的数据有许多与钢筋CDBs的强度和作用的影响有关的因素,如剪切载荷偏转、裂缝模式、模式破坏和混凝土强度。另一方面,通过将网格尺寸改变为50、25和15,从最大混凝土强度和运行时间的角度研究了网格的变化。模型采用两点荷载模拟,剪切跨度与深度之比为0.77。混凝土深梁和RPC深梁的数值和实验模型数据之间的挠度百分比差异分别为2.60和5.9%,最大剪切载荷分别为2.27%和5.40%。由于缺乏相关研究,本文的成果的重要性在于弥补这一新课题的研究空白,并确定RPC加固深梁的剪切性能。值得注意的是,有限元分析所获得的数据与之前的实验室科学研究非常一致,而误差率不超过10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Engineering
Open Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Engineering publishes research results of wide interest in emerging interdisciplinary and traditional engineering fields, including: electrical and computer engineering, civil and environmental engineering, mechanical and aerospace engineering, material science and engineering. The journal is designed to facilitate the exchange of innovative and interdisciplinary ideas between researchers from different countries. Open Engineering is a peer-reviewed, English language journal. Researchers from non-English speaking regions are provided with free language correction by scientists who are native speakers. Additionally, each published article is widely promoted to researchers working in the same field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信