Muhammed Shijas Vallikkadan, Logesh Dhanapal, Sayantani Dutta, S. K. Sivakamasundari, J. A. Moses, C. Anandharamakrishnan
{"title":"Meat Alternatives: Evolution, Structuring Techniques, Trends, and Challenges","authors":"Muhammed Shijas Vallikkadan, Logesh Dhanapal, Sayantani Dutta, S. K. Sivakamasundari, J. A. Moses, C. Anandharamakrishnan","doi":"10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The global meat substitute industry is estimated to be worth $8.1 billion by 2026. Prevailing health consciousness among consumers and their concern for the future environment has lifted the concept of meat alternatives from niche to the mainstream. Numerous research findings have emphasized the importance of meat alternatives or substitutes formulated from plant protein, animal cells, and insect-based sources, which emulate the nutritional composition and sensorial properties of animal meat. The current review discusses the necessity of meat substitutes, and their evolution, and bestows an outline of the ongoing research in this field. Novel protein sources such as vegetal proteins (cereal, pulses, oil seeds) and non-vegetal proteins (fungal, air protein, insect, myofibril) are reported to offer a viable alternative to animal meat. However, the functionalities of these proteins and the structuring technique influence the textural properties of the end products. Thus, the selection of a suitable technique is an important aspect in the formulation of the meat alternative. A thorough discussion of various structuring techniques for synthesizing matrixes and fibers with similar textural attributes to that of animal meat has been presented. Furthermore, limitations that confine consumers’ acceptance, the feasibility of scale-up, and the prerequisite for the regulatory framework for meat alternatives have also been pointed out. Overall, the ingredients and techniques of formulation of meat alternatives discussed in detail in this review can provide insight to the researchers and industries in formulating novel meat alternatives.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":565,"journal":{"name":"Food Engineering Reviews","volume":"15 2","pages":"329 - 359"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Engineering Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12393-023-09332-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The global meat substitute industry is estimated to be worth $8.1 billion by 2026. Prevailing health consciousness among consumers and their concern for the future environment has lifted the concept of meat alternatives from niche to the mainstream. Numerous research findings have emphasized the importance of meat alternatives or substitutes formulated from plant protein, animal cells, and insect-based sources, which emulate the nutritional composition and sensorial properties of animal meat. The current review discusses the necessity of meat substitutes, and their evolution, and bestows an outline of the ongoing research in this field. Novel protein sources such as vegetal proteins (cereal, pulses, oil seeds) and non-vegetal proteins (fungal, air protein, insect, myofibril) are reported to offer a viable alternative to animal meat. However, the functionalities of these proteins and the structuring technique influence the textural properties of the end products. Thus, the selection of a suitable technique is an important aspect in the formulation of the meat alternative. A thorough discussion of various structuring techniques for synthesizing matrixes and fibers with similar textural attributes to that of animal meat has been presented. Furthermore, limitations that confine consumers’ acceptance, the feasibility of scale-up, and the prerequisite for the regulatory framework for meat alternatives have also been pointed out. Overall, the ingredients and techniques of formulation of meat alternatives discussed in detail in this review can provide insight to the researchers and industries in formulating novel meat alternatives.
期刊介绍:
Food Engineering Reviews publishes articles encompassing all engineering aspects of today’s scientific food research. The journal focuses on both classic and modern food engineering topics, exploring essential factors such as the health, nutritional, and environmental aspects of food processing. Trends that will drive the discipline over time, from the lab to industrial implementation, are identified and discussed. The scope of topics addressed is broad, including transport phenomena in food processing; food process engineering; physical properties of foods; food nano-science and nano-engineering; food equipment design; food plant design; modeling food processes; microbial inactivation kinetics; preservation technologies; engineering aspects of food packaging; shelf-life, storage and distribution of foods; instrumentation, control and automation in food processing; food engineering, health and nutrition; energy and economic considerations in food engineering; sustainability; and food engineering education.