The effect of ideal strategy with formative feedback on conceptual understanding and physics processing skill of XI graders senior high school

Rahmadhani Pratama, W. Wartono, S. Kusairi
{"title":"The effect of ideal strategy with formative feedback on conceptual understanding and physics processing skill of XI graders senior high school","authors":"Rahmadhani Pratama, W. Wartono, S. Kusairi","doi":"10.21067/MPEJ.V3I1.3142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims at identifying conceptual understanding and Physics scientific processing skill of students in IDEAL learning strategy with formative feedback and IDEAL learning only without formative feedback. It employed semi-experimental design using posttest only control group design. The sampling technique used random sampling. This research took two classes of XI graders of Natural Science classes from SMAN 2 Banjarmasin. The control class was taught by using IDEAL strategy only without formative feedback. While the experimental class was taught by using IDEAL strategy with formative feedback. There is a significant difference of conceptual understanding and Physics scientific processing skill of students between IDEAL strategy with formative feedback and IDEAL strategy without formative feedback. It further affirms that students’ conceptual understanding in the class taught by IDEAL strategy with formative feedback is higher than the other. As well, students’ scientific processing skill in the class taught by IDEAL strategy with formative feedback is higher than the other.","PeriodicalId":32065,"journal":{"name":"Momentum Physics Education Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Momentum Physics Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21067/MPEJ.V3I1.3142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research aims at identifying conceptual understanding and Physics scientific processing skill of students in IDEAL learning strategy with formative feedback and IDEAL learning only without formative feedback. It employed semi-experimental design using posttest only control group design. The sampling technique used random sampling. This research took two classes of XI graders of Natural Science classes from SMAN 2 Banjarmasin. The control class was taught by using IDEAL strategy only without formative feedback. While the experimental class was taught by using IDEAL strategy with formative feedback. There is a significant difference of conceptual understanding and Physics scientific processing skill of students between IDEAL strategy with formative feedback and IDEAL strategy without formative feedback. It further affirms that students’ conceptual understanding in the class taught by IDEAL strategy with formative feedback is higher than the other. As well, students’ scientific processing skill in the class taught by IDEAL strategy with formative feedback is higher than the other.
具有形成性反馈的理想策略对高一学生概念理解和物理加工技能的影响
本研究旨在识别学生在有形成性反馈的IDEAL学习策略和只有形成性反馈才有IDEAL学习中的概念理解和物理科学处理技能。它采用了半实验设计,仅采用后测对照组设计。抽样技术采用随机抽样。这项研究选取了两个班的XI自然科学班的学生。控制课只使用IDEAL策略进行教学,没有形成性反馈。而实验课则采用IDEAL策略和形成性反馈进行教学。有形成性反馈的IDEAL策略与无形成性反馈IDEAL策略在学生的概念理解和物理科学处理技能上存在显著差异。进一步肯定了IDEAL策略与形成性反馈在课堂教学中的概念理解能力高于其他策略。在IDEAL策略与形成性反馈相结合的课堂上,学生的科学处理能力也高于其他策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信