The Big Five and Collaborative Problem Solving: A Narrative Systematic Review

IF 3.6 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

European Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1177/08902070231198650

Zorana Jolić Marjanović, Ksenija Krstić, Milana Rajić, Ivana Stepanović Ilić, Marina Videnović, Ana Altaras Dimitrijević

{"title":"The Big Five and Collaborative Problem Solving: A Narrative Systematic Review","authors":"Zorana Jolić Marjanović, Ksenija Krstić, Milana Rajić, Ivana Stepanović Ilić, Marina Videnović, Ana Altaras Dimitrijević","doi":"10.1177/08902070231198650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study integrates available findings on the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and collaborative problem solving (CPS), as a specific type of teamwork. Based on a systematic search and screening of the literature, 47 papers were reviewed. Having separately analyzed how individual and group-level traits relate to the processes and outcomes of CPS, we found several meaningful associations. Both individual-level and group-level Conscientiousness and Agreeableness were positively related to the quality of CPS. The former trait contributed more to the enactment of task roles/behaviors in CPS, to task-related team processes and team performance; the latter was dominantly related to the enactment of social roles/behaviors, and to relationship-related team processes and emergent states. The role of the remaining traits in CPS depended on the level of analysis, with individual Extraversion being particularly important for within-group positioning, and group Emotional Stability affecting team cohesion. Unsurprisingly, the effects of group-level traits on CPS also depended on the method of aggregating individual trait scores. The hypothesis that some traits would relate more to CPS processes and others to its outcomes was partially confirmed, while the assumption that team processes would mediate the effects of group-level traits on CPS outcomes received substantial support.","PeriodicalId":51376,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231198650","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study integrates available findings on the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and collaborative problem solving (CPS), as a specific type of teamwork. Based on a systematic search and screening of the literature, 47 papers were reviewed. Having separately analyzed how individual and group-level traits relate to the processes and outcomes of CPS, we found several meaningful associations. Both individual-level and group-level Conscientiousness and Agreeableness were positively related to the quality of CPS. The former trait contributed more to the enactment of task roles/behaviors in CPS, to task-related team processes and team performance; the latter was dominantly related to the enactment of social roles/behaviors, and to relationship-related team processes and emergent states. The role of the remaining traits in CPS depended on the level of analysis, with individual Extraversion being particularly important for within-group positioning, and group Emotional Stability affecting team cohesion. Unsurprisingly, the effects of group-level traits on CPS also depended on the method of aggregating individual trait scores. The hypothesis that some traits would relate more to CPS processes and others to its outcomes was partially confirmed, while the assumption that team processes would mediate the effects of group-level traits on CPS outcomes received substantial support.

查看原文本刊更多论文

五巨头与合作解决问题：叙事系统综述

目前的研究整合了关于五大人格特征与合作解决问题（CPS）之间关系的现有研究结果，作为一种特定类型的团队合作。在系统检索和筛选文献的基础上，对47篇论文进行了综述。在分别分析了个体和群体水平的特质如何与CPS的过程和结果相关后，我们发现了几个有意义的关联。个体水平和群体水平的自觉性和合意性均与CPS质量呈正相关。前者对CPS中任务角色/行为的设定、与任务相关的团队过程和团队绩效有更大的贡献；后者主要与社会角色/行为的设定有关，与关系相关的团队过程和紧急状态有关。其余特质在CPS中的作用取决于分析水平，个人外向对于团队内部定位尤为重要，而团队情绪稳定性影响团队凝聚力。不出所料，群体水平的特质对CPS的影响也取决于个体特质得分的汇总方法。一些特质与CPS过程有关，而另一些则与CPS结果有关，这一假设得到了部分证实，而团队过程将介导群体水平特质对CPS结果的影响的假设得到了大量支持。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

11.90

自引率

8.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： It is intended that the journal reflects all areas of current personality psychology. The Journal emphasizes (1) human individuality as manifested in cognitive processes, emotional and motivational functioning, and their physiological and genetic underpinnings, and personal ways of interacting with the environment, (2) individual differences in personality structure and dynamics, (3) studies of intelligence and interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, and (4) development of personality differences as revealed by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.