Impacts of tropical hurricanes on the vegetation cover of the lower basin and estuary of San José del Cabo, Baja California Sur, Mexico

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Marcos Shiba-Reyes, E. Troyo, R. Martínez-Rincón, A. Breceda
{"title":"Impacts of tropical hurricanes on the vegetation cover of the lower basin and estuary of San José del Cabo, Baja California Sur, Mexico","authors":"Marcos Shiba-Reyes, E. Troyo, R. Martínez-Rincón, A. Breceda","doi":"10.5154/r.rchscfa.2020.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Tropical hurricanes modify composition and structure of \necosystems. Objective: To analyze the impact of tropical hurricanes on the recovery and \nresilience of vegetation cover. Materials and methods: The resilience of the lower basin and estuary of San \nJose del Cabo was evaluated by studying the impact of 11 tropical hurricanes \n(2013-2017) on the vegetation cover. Landsat images were analyzed for each \nevent and two SPOT-6 images for the Hurricane Lidia. The areas of gain, stability, \nloss and recovery of vegetation types were estimated based on the analysis of \nchanges in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Results and discussion: Average stability of vegetation cover was 90 %; \nhowever, in the case of hurricane Odile (2014) and Lidia (2017), stability \ndecreased considerably, with a loss of 35.4 and 20.5 %, respectively, being the \nperennial herbaceous vegetation the most affected. One year after Odile and Lidia, \nrecovery was 8.4 % and 25.4 %, respectively; the most recovered vegetation type \nwas reed-tree. The analysis of SPOT-6 images allowed the detailed observation of \nLidia's effect on palm grove. The main cause of its loss was runoff from the stream, \nwhich favored the growth of invasive species (Arundo donax L. and Tamarix sp.); \nfurthermore, it was estimated that 1.4 ha were deforested, and an area of 20 ha \naffected by fire in 2017. Conclusion: Vegetation is resilient to tropical hurricanes; however, events that \nprovide more than 50 % of annual precipitation decrease the capacity of vegetation \nto recover.","PeriodicalId":54479,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales Y Del Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2020.03.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Tropical hurricanes modify composition and structure of ecosystems. Objective: To analyze the impact of tropical hurricanes on the recovery and resilience of vegetation cover. Materials and methods: The resilience of the lower basin and estuary of San Jose del Cabo was evaluated by studying the impact of 11 tropical hurricanes (2013-2017) on the vegetation cover. Landsat images were analyzed for each event and two SPOT-6 images for the Hurricane Lidia. The areas of gain, stability, loss and recovery of vegetation types were estimated based on the analysis of changes in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Results and discussion: Average stability of vegetation cover was 90 %; however, in the case of hurricane Odile (2014) and Lidia (2017), stability decreased considerably, with a loss of 35.4 and 20.5 %, respectively, being the perennial herbaceous vegetation the most affected. One year after Odile and Lidia, recovery was 8.4 % and 25.4 %, respectively; the most recovered vegetation type was reed-tree. The analysis of SPOT-6 images allowed the detailed observation of Lidia's effect on palm grove. The main cause of its loss was runoff from the stream, which favored the growth of invasive species (Arundo donax L. and Tamarix sp.); furthermore, it was estimated that 1.4 ha were deforested, and an area of 20 ha affected by fire in 2017. Conclusion: Vegetation is resilient to tropical hurricanes; however, events that provide more than 50 % of annual precipitation decrease the capacity of vegetation to recover.
热带飓风对墨西哥下加利福尼亚州圣何塞湾下游盆地和河口植被覆盖的影响
热带飓风改变了生态系统的组成和结构。目的:分析热带飓风对植被恢复和恢复力的影响。材料与方法:通过研究2013-2017年11次热带飓风对圣何塞德尔卡波下游盆地和河口植被覆盖的影响,评价其恢复能力。分析了每个事件的陆地卫星图像和两个Lidia飓风的SPOT-6图像。通过对归一化植被指数(NDVI)变化的分析,估算了植被类型的增益、稳定、损失和恢复面积。结果与讨论:植被覆盖度的平均稳定性为90%;然而,在飓风Odile(2014)和Lidia(2017)的情况下,稳定性下降幅度较大,分别损失35.4%和20.5%,是多年生草本植被受影响最大的。奥德乐和利迪雅治疗后1年,恢复率分别为8.4%和25.4%;恢复最多的植被类型是芦苇-乔木。对SPOT-6图像的分析可以详细观察Lidia对棕榈林的影响。径流对入侵物种(柽柳和黄柳)的生长有利;此外,据估计,2017年有1.4公顷的森林被砍伐,20公顷的面积受到火灾的影响。结论:植被对热带飓风具有较强的抵御能力;然而,提供超过50%年降水量的事件会降低植被的恢复能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente (RCHSCFA) is a scientific journal that aims to raise awareness of high-quality research products related to forest, arid, temperate and tropical environments in the world. Since its foundation in 1994, the RCHSCFA has served as a space for scientific dissemination and discussion at a national and international level among academics, researchers, undergraduate and graduate students, forest managers and public/private entities that are interested in the forest environment. All content published in the journal first goes through a strict triple-blind review process and is published in the following formats: Scientific Articles, Review Articles, Methodologies, Technical or Technological Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信