Assessing gender discrimination during infancy and childhood using twins: The case of rural Spain, 1750-1950

IF 1 3区 历史学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Francisco J. Marco-Gracia, Francisco J. Beltrán Tapia
{"title":"Assessing gender discrimination during infancy and childhood using twins: The case of rural Spain, 1750-1950","authors":"Francisco J. Marco-Gracia, Francisco J. Beltrán Tapia","doi":"10.1080/1081602X.2022.2039878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article uncovers the existence of discriminatory practices in pre-industrial Spain by examining the fate of twins. The analysis of the complete parish registers of a small rural area (17 villages) shows that female twins were discriminated both at birth and during infancy and childhood. Not only the sex ratio of twins at baptism was extremely unbalanced, but discrimination continued throughout infancy and childhood and resulted in female excess mortality, despite that males are biologically more vulnerable. Although their extremely high mortality rates question the idea that twins constituted an exogenous shock to family decisions due to their impact of the family budget, studying twins helps shedding more light on discriminatory patterns because many families prioritised male twins to enhance their survival chances.","PeriodicalId":46118,"journal":{"name":"History of the Family","volume":"27 1","pages":"658 - 678"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of the Family","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2022.2039878","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article uncovers the existence of discriminatory practices in pre-industrial Spain by examining the fate of twins. The analysis of the complete parish registers of a small rural area (17 villages) shows that female twins were discriminated both at birth and during infancy and childhood. Not only the sex ratio of twins at baptism was extremely unbalanced, but discrimination continued throughout infancy and childhood and resulted in female excess mortality, despite that males are biologically more vulnerable. Although their extremely high mortality rates question the idea that twins constituted an exogenous shock to family decisions due to their impact of the family budget, studying twins helps shedding more light on discriminatory patterns because many families prioritised male twins to enhance their survival chances.
用双胞胎评估婴儿期和儿童期的性别歧视:西班牙农村的案例,1750-1950
本文通过研究双胞胎的命运,揭示了工业化前西班牙存在的歧视性做法。对一个小农村地区(17个村庄)的完整教区登记册的分析表明,女性双胞胎在出生时以及在婴儿期和儿童期都受到歧视。不仅受洗时双胞胎的性别比例极不平衡,而且歧视在整个婴儿期和儿童期持续存在,导致女性死亡率过高,尽管男性在生理上更脆弱。尽管双胞胎极高的死亡率质疑了双胞胎对家庭决策构成外源性冲击的观点,因为他们对家庭预算的影响,但研究双胞胎有助于更多地揭示歧视模式,因为许多家庭优先考虑男性双胞胎,以提高他们的生存机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The History of the Family: An International Quarterly makes a significant contribution by publishing works reflecting new developments in scholarship and by charting new directions in the historical study of the family. Further emphasizing the international developments in historical research on the family, the Quarterly encourages articles on comparative research across various cultures and societies in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Pacific Rim, in addition to Europe, the United States and Canada, as well as work in the context of global history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信