Three Perspectives on Marine Life in International Disputes

IF 1.3 3区社会学 Q1 LAW

International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law Pub Date : 2023-06-07 DOI:10.1163/15718085-bja10136

Sondre Torp Helmersen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article charts three different approaches that international courts and tribunals have taken to marine life. Some have viewed marine life primarily as an economic resource, worthy of conservation only in order to ensure future exploitation. Others have seen marine life as an object of conservation in its own right. Yet others have tried to balance the two perspectives. The article also examines the sources that seem to have influenced the judges, finding that these range from the applicable law to external sources and contested legal principles.

查看原文本刊更多论文

国际争端中海洋生物的三个视角

本文列举了国际法院和法庭对海洋生物采取的三种不同方法。一些人认为海洋生物主要是一种经济资源，值得保护只是为了确保未来的开发。其他人则将海洋生物视为保护对象。然而，其他人则试图平衡这两种观点。文章还审查了似乎影响法官的来源，发现这些来源包括适用法律、外部来源和有争议的法律原则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law LAW-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law addresses all aspects of marine and coastal law. In addition to normal in-depth scholarly articles, the Journal contains a distinctive feature: a vigorous ‘Current Legal Developments’ section which provides notes and commentary on international treaties and case law, national statute law, national court decisions, and other aspects of state practice; includes the relevant original documentation where appropriate; and monitors developments in relevant international organizations at a global and regional level. The format also includes a book review section.