Selected Determinants of the Polish and South African Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education of Students with Special Educational Needs

A. Czyż, Johannes Petrus Rossouw, E. Niemczyk
{"title":"Selected Determinants of the Polish and South African Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education of Students with Special Educational Needs","authors":"A. Czyż, Johannes Petrus Rossouw, E. Niemczyk","doi":"10.35765/hw.2023.2261.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this research was to assess teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education (IE) of students with special developmental needs in the school space. The article is a comparative study in which teachers from Polish and South African schools – special and public schools – took part. \nTHE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Following a pragmatic paradigm, a quantitative strategy and diagnostic survey method were applied. The specially prepared tool, the Scale for Attitudes Towards IE, was used to generate data. Confirming the normal distribution of variables, ANOVA and t-test were used for independent variables and descriptive statistics.. For post-hoc analyses, Tukey’s HSD test was used for equal or different N. \nTHE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The own research on teachers’ attitudes towards IE was preceded by theoretical considerations on the idea of educational inclusion. Determinants supporting the inclusion of children with special educational needs in mainstream schools were identified. \nRESEARCH RESULTS: In the overall assessment of attitudes towards inclusive education there were no statistically significant intergroup differences between teachers in Polish and South African schools. However, clear differences emerged in post-hoc analyses of the variables such as: type of the institution and seniority. \nCONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The presented international comparative research on teachers’ attitudes towards IE takes into account not only the current state, but also the historical context of both nations, marked by the stigma of segregation and the fight against discrimination. The study shows how it is important to pay attention to the process of teachers’ education – pedagogues, especially, the ones prepared to work in mainstream institutions, for eliminating barriers, adapting curricula to the students’ individual needs, and building openness. It is essential to monitor the correlation between seniority and the direction and intensity of attitudes towards education open for all. ","PeriodicalId":53094,"journal":{"name":"Horyzonty Wychowania","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horyzonty Wychowania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35765/hw.2023.2261.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this research was to assess teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education (IE) of students with special developmental needs in the school space. The article is a comparative study in which teachers from Polish and South African schools – special and public schools – took part. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: Following a pragmatic paradigm, a quantitative strategy and diagnostic survey method were applied. The specially prepared tool, the Scale for Attitudes Towards IE, was used to generate data. Confirming the normal distribution of variables, ANOVA and t-test were used for independent variables and descriptive statistics.. For post-hoc analyses, Tukey’s HSD test was used for equal or different N. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The own research on teachers’ attitudes towards IE was preceded by theoretical considerations on the idea of educational inclusion. Determinants supporting the inclusion of children with special educational needs in mainstream schools were identified. RESEARCH RESULTS: In the overall assessment of attitudes towards inclusive education there were no statistically significant intergroup differences between teachers in Polish and South African schools. However, clear differences emerged in post-hoc analyses of the variables such as: type of the institution and seniority. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The presented international comparative research on teachers’ attitudes towards IE takes into account not only the current state, but also the historical context of both nations, marked by the stigma of segregation and the fight against discrimination. The study shows how it is important to pay attention to the process of teachers’ education – pedagogues, especially, the ones prepared to work in mainstream institutions, for eliminating barriers, adapting curricula to the students’ individual needs, and building openness. It is essential to monitor the correlation between seniority and the direction and intensity of attitudes towards education open for all. 
波兰和南非教师对特殊教育需要学生全纳教育态度的选定决定因素
研究目的:本研究的主要目的是评估教师对学校空间中特殊发展需要学生的全纳教育(IE)的态度。这篇文章是一项比较研究,来自波兰和南非学校的教师——特殊学校和公立学校——参与了这项研究。研究问题和方法:遵循语用范式,采用定量策略和诊断调查方法。特别准备的工具,对IE的态度量表,被用来生成数据。为了确认变量的正态分布,对自变量和描述性统计采用方差分析和t检验。对于事后分析,Tukey的HSD测试被用于相同或不同的n。论证过程:在对教师对IE的态度进行自己的研究之前,对教育包容理念进行了理论考虑。确定了支持将有特殊教育需要的儿童纳入主流学校的决定因素。研究结果:在对全纳教育态度的总体评估中,波兰和南非学校的教师之间没有统计学上显著的组间差异。然而,在诸如机构类型和资历等变量的事后分析中,出现了明显的差异。结论、创新和建议:关于教师对IE态度的国际比较研究不仅考虑了现状,而且考虑了两国的历史背景,以种族隔离的耻辱和反对歧视为标志。这项研究表明,关注教师的教育过程,特别是那些准备在主流机构工作的教师,对于消除障碍、使课程适应学生的个人需求和建立开放性是多么重要。必须监测资历与对全民开放教育的态度的方向和强度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信