Disrupted Routines: A Thoughtful Response to Controlling Student Writing

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
W. Duffy
{"title":"Disrupted Routines: A Thoughtful Response to Controlling Student Writing","authors":"W. Duffy","doi":"10.1080/1358684X.2022.2163879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article uses a quasi-spiritual lens to examine why some teachers feel compelled to inappropriately control student writing. For almost half a century, professionals in composition studies have engaged in vigorous conversations about the problem of teachers co-opting, correcting, and rewriting (essentially appropriating) student texts as part of their teaching practice. Most agree this prescriptive approach discourages students from owning their texts, while simultaneously short-circuiting the learning process. However, few have asked why the compulsion to control student writing persists for some teachers. Applying ideas from Jerome Miller’s book The Way of Suffering: A Geography of Crisis, this paper offers one possibility: The urge to inappropriately control student texts may come from our unwillingness to suffer. Can we, as teachers, allow our safe routines – our orderly worlds – to be disrupted by imperfect student writing?","PeriodicalId":54156,"journal":{"name":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2022.2163879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article uses a quasi-spiritual lens to examine why some teachers feel compelled to inappropriately control student writing. For almost half a century, professionals in composition studies have engaged in vigorous conversations about the problem of teachers co-opting, correcting, and rewriting (essentially appropriating) student texts as part of their teaching practice. Most agree this prescriptive approach discourages students from owning their texts, while simultaneously short-circuiting the learning process. However, few have asked why the compulsion to control student writing persists for some teachers. Applying ideas from Jerome Miller’s book The Way of Suffering: A Geography of Crisis, this paper offers one possibility: The urge to inappropriately control student texts may come from our unwillingness to suffer. Can we, as teachers, allow our safe routines – our orderly worlds – to be disrupted by imperfect student writing?
打乱的程序:对控制学生写作的深思熟虑的回应
这篇文章用一个准精神的视角来审视为什么有些老师觉得被迫不恰当地控制学生的写作。近半个世纪以来,作文研究领域的专业人士就教师在教学实践中挪用、修改和改写(本质上是挪用)学生课文的问题展开了激烈的讨论。大多数人都同意,这种规定性的方法阻碍了学生拥有自己的课本,同时也缩短了学习过程。然而,很少有人问,为什么一些老师一直有控制学生写作的冲动。根据杰罗姆·米勒(Jerome Miller)的著作《苦难之路:危机地理》(The Way of Suffering: A Geography of Crisis)中的观点,本文提出了一种可能性:不恰当地控制学生文本的冲动可能来自于我们不愿意受苦。作为老师,我们能允许我们安全的日常生活——我们有序的世界——被不完美的学生作文打乱吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信