{"title":"Disrupted Routines: A Thoughtful Response to Controlling Student Writing","authors":"W. Duffy","doi":"10.1080/1358684X.2022.2163879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article uses a quasi-spiritual lens to examine why some teachers feel compelled to inappropriately control student writing. For almost half a century, professionals in composition studies have engaged in vigorous conversations about the problem of teachers co-opting, correcting, and rewriting (essentially appropriating) student texts as part of their teaching practice. Most agree this prescriptive approach discourages students from owning their texts, while simultaneously short-circuiting the learning process. However, few have asked why the compulsion to control student writing persists for some teachers. Applying ideas from Jerome Miller’s book The Way of Suffering: A Geography of Crisis, this paper offers one possibility: The urge to inappropriately control student texts may come from our unwillingness to suffer. Can we, as teachers, allow our safe routines – our orderly worlds – to be disrupted by imperfect student writing?","PeriodicalId":54156,"journal":{"name":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2022.2163879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article uses a quasi-spiritual lens to examine why some teachers feel compelled to inappropriately control student writing. For almost half a century, professionals in composition studies have engaged in vigorous conversations about the problem of teachers co-opting, correcting, and rewriting (essentially appropriating) student texts as part of their teaching practice. Most agree this prescriptive approach discourages students from owning their texts, while simultaneously short-circuiting the learning process. However, few have asked why the compulsion to control student writing persists for some teachers. Applying ideas from Jerome Miller’s book The Way of Suffering: A Geography of Crisis, this paper offers one possibility: The urge to inappropriately control student texts may come from our unwillingness to suffer. Can we, as teachers, allow our safe routines – our orderly worlds – to be disrupted by imperfect student writing?
这篇文章用一个准精神的视角来审视为什么有些老师觉得被迫不恰当地控制学生的写作。近半个世纪以来,作文研究领域的专业人士就教师在教学实践中挪用、修改和改写(本质上是挪用)学生课文的问题展开了激烈的讨论。大多数人都同意,这种规定性的方法阻碍了学生拥有自己的课本,同时也缩短了学习过程。然而,很少有人问,为什么一些老师一直有控制学生写作的冲动。根据杰罗姆·米勒(Jerome Miller)的著作《苦难之路:危机地理》(The Way of Suffering: A Geography of Crisis)中的观点,本文提出了一种可能性:不恰当地控制学生文本的冲动可能来自于我们不愿意受苦。作为老师,我们能允许我们安全的日常生活——我们有序的世界——被不完美的学生作文打乱吗?