Assessment of Quality of Life (QoL) of Colorectal Cancer Patients using QLQ-30 and QLQ-CR 29 at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
International Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2022-05-17 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/4745631
Jumanah T Qedair, Abdullah A Al Qurashi, Saeed Alamoudi, Syed Sameer Aga, Alqassem Y Hakami
{"title":"Assessment of Quality of Life (QoL) of Colorectal Cancer Patients using QLQ-30 and QLQ-CR 29 at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Jumanah T Qedair,&nbsp;Abdullah A Al Qurashi,&nbsp;Saeed Alamoudi,&nbsp;Syed Sameer Aga,&nbsp;Alqassem Y Hakami","doi":"10.1155/2022/4745631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to assess the quality of life (QoL) and its predictors in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 118 CRC patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City, a tertiary hospital in Jeddah, participated in this study. The participants were provided with the online questionnaire via WhatsApp by trained researchers and data collectors in February 2021. All participants were required to answer the three-section questionnaire comprising of (a) demographic data and a validated Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires, (b) a general version (QLQ-30), and (c) a CRC-specific version (QLQ-CR29).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis revealed that the most common comorbidity among the participants was diabetes mellitus (42.4%). In addition, the mean global health status was 63.91 ± 24.75. For the global health tool QLQ-C30, results exhibited that physical functioning [62.94 (30.04)] and social functioning [63.56 (31.95)] scored below the threshold, while the cognitive functioning scale scored the highest [74.86 (25.11)]. In addition, on the QLQ-C30 scales, fatigue and insomnia were distressing, with fatigue scoring the highest. For the disease-specific tool QLQ-CR29, it was found that for the symptom scale, urinary frequency and embarrassment scored the highest. Conclusion. The participants reported high global quality of life on both the EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-CR29 scales. This study identifies the factors and predictors that affect the quality of life of CRC patients in Saudi Arabia. Recognizing these factors and predictors may empower those patients to maintain positive perception towards the impact of colorectal cancer and improve their survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":45960,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9130012/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4745631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to assess the quality of life (QoL) and its predictors in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah.

Methods: A total of 118 CRC patients at King Abdulaziz Medical City, a tertiary hospital in Jeddah, participated in this study. The participants were provided with the online questionnaire via WhatsApp by trained researchers and data collectors in February 2021. All participants were required to answer the three-section questionnaire comprising of (a) demographic data and a validated Arabic version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires, (b) a general version (QLQ-30), and (c) a CRC-specific version (QLQ-CR29).

Results: Statistical analysis revealed that the most common comorbidity among the participants was diabetes mellitus (42.4%). In addition, the mean global health status was 63.91 ± 24.75. For the global health tool QLQ-C30, results exhibited that physical functioning [62.94 (30.04)] and social functioning [63.56 (31.95)] scored below the threshold, while the cognitive functioning scale scored the highest [74.86 (25.11)]. In addition, on the QLQ-C30 scales, fatigue and insomnia were distressing, with fatigue scoring the highest. For the disease-specific tool QLQ-CR29, it was found that for the symptom scale, urinary frequency and embarrassment scored the highest. Conclusion. The participants reported high global quality of life on both the EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-CR29 scales. This study identifies the factors and predictors that affect the quality of life of CRC patients in Saudi Arabia. Recognizing these factors and predictors may empower those patients to maintain positive perception towards the impact of colorectal cancer and improve their survival.

在沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城应用QLQ-30和qlq - cr29评价结直肠癌患者的生活质量
目的探讨吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城结直肠癌患者的生活质量(QoL)及其预测因素。方法选取吉达市三级医院阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城的118例结直肠癌患者作为研究对象。2021年2月,训练有素的研究人员和数据收集人员通过WhatsApp向参与者提供在线问卷。所有参与者都需要回答三部分问卷,包括(a)人口统计数据和欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷的有效阿拉伯语版本,(b)一般版本(QLQ-30)和(c) crc特定版本(QLQ-CR29)。结果统计分析显示,糖尿病是最常见的合并症(42.4%)。总体健康状况平均值为63.91±24.75。对于整体健康工具QLQ-C30,结果显示身体功能[62.94(30.04)]和社会功能[63.56(31.95)]得分低于阈值,而认知功能量表得分最高[74.86(25.11)]。此外,在QLQ-C30量表上,疲劳和失眠是令人痛苦的,疲劳得分最高。对于疾病特异性工具QLQ-CR29,研究发现,在症状量表中,尿频和尴尬得分最高。结论。参与者在EORTC QLQ-30和QLQ-CR29量表上都报告了较高的整体生活质量。本研究确定了影响沙特阿拉伯结直肠癌患者生活质量的因素和预测因素。认识到这些因素和预测因素可以使这些患者对结直肠癌的影响保持积极的认识,提高他们的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Surgical Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of surgical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信