Exhalation of alternative tobacco product aerosols differs from cigarette smoke-and may lead to alternative health risks.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2022-02-28 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X221078200
Emma Karey, Taylor Reed, Maria Katsigeorgis, Kayla Farrell, Jade Hess, Grace Gibbon, Michael Weitzman, Terry Gordon
{"title":"Exhalation of alternative tobacco product aerosols differs from cigarette smoke-and may lead to alternative health risks.","authors":"Emma Karey, Taylor Reed, Maria Katsigeorgis, Kayla Farrell, Jade Hess, Grace Gibbon, Michael Weitzman, Terry Gordon","doi":"10.1177/1179173X221078200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variation in alternative tobacco product (ATP) constituents, heating potential, and consumer behaviors have made it difficult to characterize their health risks. To date, most toxicity studies of ATPs have used established cigarette endpoints to inform study design. Furthermore, to assess where ATPs fall on the tobacco harm continuum, with cigarettes representing maximum potential risk, studies have tended to compare the relative biological responses to ATPs against those due to cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) To characterize the exhalation profiles of two popular ATPs: electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and hookah waterpipes (hookah) and 2) to determine if ATP exhalation patterns were representative of cigarette exhalation patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exhalation patterns were recorded (mouth only, nose only, or both mouth and nose) among individuals observed in the New York City tri-state area using a recognizable tobacco product (cigarette, e-cigarette, or hookah). Cigarette smokers and e-cigarette vapers were observed on city streets; water-pipe smokers were observed inside Manhattan hookah bars.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>E-cigarette vapers practiced exclusive nasal exhalation at far higher rates than did cigarette smokers (19.5% vs 4.9%). Among vapers, e-cigarette device type was also significantly associated with exhalation profile. Overall, cigarette smokers exhaled from their nose approximately half to one-third as often as ATP users (hookah and e-cigarettes, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nasal exhalation of tobacco emissions appears to be a shared characteristic across several types of ATPs. It is therefore plausible that ATP-specific consumer behaviors may foster unique upper respiratory health consequences that have not been observed in smokers. Thus, product-specific behaviors should inform the prioritization of biological endpoints used in studies evaluating ATP toxicity and health effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X221078200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Variation in alternative tobacco product (ATP) constituents, heating potential, and consumer behaviors have made it difficult to characterize their health risks. To date, most toxicity studies of ATPs have used established cigarette endpoints to inform study design. Furthermore, to assess where ATPs fall on the tobacco harm continuum, with cigarettes representing maximum potential risk, studies have tended to compare the relative biological responses to ATPs against those due to cigarettes.

Objectives: 1) To characterize the exhalation profiles of two popular ATPs: electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and hookah waterpipes (hookah) and 2) to determine if ATP exhalation patterns were representative of cigarette exhalation patterns.

Methods: Exhalation patterns were recorded (mouth only, nose only, or both mouth and nose) among individuals observed in the New York City tri-state area using a recognizable tobacco product (cigarette, e-cigarette, or hookah). Cigarette smokers and e-cigarette vapers were observed on city streets; water-pipe smokers were observed inside Manhattan hookah bars.

Results: E-cigarette vapers practiced exclusive nasal exhalation at far higher rates than did cigarette smokers (19.5% vs 4.9%). Among vapers, e-cigarette device type was also significantly associated with exhalation profile. Overall, cigarette smokers exhaled from their nose approximately half to one-third as often as ATP users (hookah and e-cigarettes, respectively).

Conclusions: Nasal exhalation of tobacco emissions appears to be a shared characteristic across several types of ATPs. It is therefore plausible that ATP-specific consumer behaviors may foster unique upper respiratory health consequences that have not been observed in smokers. Thus, product-specific behaviors should inform the prioritization of biological endpoints used in studies evaluating ATP toxicity and health effects.

替代烟草产品气溶胶的呼出不同于香烟烟雾,并可能导致替代健康风险
背景替代烟草制品(ATP)成分、加热潜力和消费者行为的变化使得很难描述其健康风险。迄今为止,大多数ATP的毒性研究都使用了已确定的香烟终点来为研究设计提供信息。此外,为了评估ATP在烟草危害连续体中的位置,香烟代表着最大的潜在风险,研究倾向于将ATP的相对生物反应与香烟引起的反应进行比较。目的1)表征两种流行的ATP的呼气特征:电子烟和水烟水管;2)确定ATP呼气模式是否代表香烟呼气模式。方法记录在纽约市三州地区使用可识别烟草产品(香烟、电子烟或水烟)观察到的个体的呼气模式(仅用嘴、仅用鼻子或同时用嘴和鼻子)。在城市街道上观察到吸烟者和电子烟爱好者;在曼哈顿的水烟酒吧里观察到了用水管抽烟的人。结果电子烟吸烟者进行纯鼻呼气的比率远高于吸烟者(19.5%对4.9%)。在电子烟吸烟者中,电子烟设备类型也与呼气特征显著相关。总的来说,吸烟者从鼻子呼气的频率大约是ATP使用者的一半到三分之一(分别是水烟和电子烟)。结论烟草排放物的鼻腔呼气似乎是几种ATP的共同特征。因此,ATP特异性消费者行为可能会产生独特的上呼吸道健康后果,这在吸烟者中是没有观察到的。因此,产品特定行为应为评估ATP毒性和健康影响的研究中使用的生物终点的优先级提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信