Entre el Sumak Kawsay y el Buen Vivir Institucional. Los discursos sociales del Buen Vivir en las zonas rurales del Sur de Ecuador

IF 0.2
Antonio Alaminos Chica, Clemente A. Penalva Verdú
{"title":"Entre el Sumak Kawsay y el Buen Vivir Institucional. Los discursos sociales del Buen Vivir en las zonas rurales del Sur de Ecuador","authors":"Antonio Alaminos Chica, Clemente A. Penalva Verdú","doi":"10.30827/REVPAZ.V10I1.5976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strategies of building alternative measures of development have been established from a disconnected approach of very significant elements such as the legitimation or the dynamics of change of capitalism. In this research we study a particular case for a proposal of measuring development from the concept of Sumak Kawsay. This concept brings together very special properties which, although characterized by the same criteria as its alternatives (multidimensionality, segmentation, balance and subjectivity), resort to the novel use of a myth, that legitimizes communitary ways of living that are different to the most widespread lifestyles. This paper presents a discourse analysis of the conceptions about Good Living that can be extracted from the texts of interviews and other group dynamics carried out in the peasant communities of Nabon, a rural canton of the South of Ecuador. The analysis results a relational structure in which the limits and contents of an adaptive or hybrid discourse are defined, which is the product of the interaction between two opposing discourses: Sumak Kawsay (community and traditional) and goverment’s Institutional Good Living (societal and modern). This interaction allows to expose and to explain the set of contradictions detected; and the emergence of new categories that establish the limits of this adaptive discourse on Good Living: bad living, good dying or quality of life. In this way, the positions of the internal fractures of the populations are explained, as well as their strategies for subsistence and negotiation with government authorities.","PeriodicalId":42009,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Paz y Conflictos","volume":"10 1","pages":"137-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Paz y Conflictos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30827/REVPAZ.V10I1.5976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The strategies of building alternative measures of development have been established from a disconnected approach of very significant elements such as the legitimation or the dynamics of change of capitalism. In this research we study a particular case for a proposal of measuring development from the concept of Sumak Kawsay. This concept brings together very special properties which, although characterized by the same criteria as its alternatives (multidimensionality, segmentation, balance and subjectivity), resort to the novel use of a myth, that legitimizes communitary ways of living that are different to the most widespread lifestyles. This paper presents a discourse analysis of the conceptions about Good Living that can be extracted from the texts of interviews and other group dynamics carried out in the peasant communities of Nabon, a rural canton of the South of Ecuador. The analysis results a relational structure in which the limits and contents of an adaptive or hybrid discourse are defined, which is the product of the interaction between two opposing discourses: Sumak Kawsay (community and traditional) and goverment’s Institutional Good Living (societal and modern). This interaction allows to expose and to explain the set of contradictions detected; and the emergence of new categories that establish the limits of this adaptive discourse on Good Living: bad living, good dying or quality of life. In this way, the positions of the internal fractures of the populations are explained, as well as their strategies for subsistence and negotiation with government authorities.
在Sumak Kawsay和良好的机构生活之间。厄瓜多尔南部农村地区美好生活的社会话语
建立替代发展措施的战略是通过对诸如资本主义的合法化或变化的动力等非常重要的因素的不连贯的方法建立起来的。在本研究中,我们从苏马克·卡塞的概念出发,研究了衡量发展的一个具体案例。这一概念汇集了非常特殊的属性,尽管其特征与其他概念(多维性、分割性、平衡性和主观性)具有相同的标准,但它诉诸于对神话的新颖使用,使不同于最普遍的生活方式的社区生活方式合法化。本文对“美好生活”的概念进行了话语分析,这些概念可以从采访文本和其他群体动态中提取出来,这些文本是在厄瓜多尔南部农村州纳邦的农民社区进行的。分析的结果是一种关系结构,在这种结构中,适应性或混合话语的界限和内容被定义,这是两个对立话语之间相互作用的产物:苏马克·卡萨伊(社区和传统)和政府的制度性美好生活(社会和现代)。这种相互作用允许暴露和解释所检测到的一系列矛盾;以及新类别的出现,这些类别确立了这种关于美好生活的适应性话语的界限:糟糕的生活,美好的死亡或生活质量。通过这种方式,解释了人口内部断裂的位置,以及他们的生存战略和与政府当局的谈判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Paz y Conflictos
Revista de Paz y Conflictos POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信