Minilateralism and Backlash in the Nuclear Security Summit: The Consequences of Nuclear Governance outside the IAEA

IF 2.2 2区社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Security Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1080/09636412.2021.2019827

Leah Matchett

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Frustration with large multilateral organizations is on the rise, leading some states to seek consensus in exclusive “minilateral” groupings. However, there is little to no research on how such an organization relates to the broader multilateral regime. I use the case of the Nuclear Security Summits (NSS) to examine the consequences of exclusion. I find states excluded from the NSS are more likely to criticize the Summits, even where they share policy preferences with included states. A comparison of follow-on initiatives shows that those more associated with the Summits are less likely to gain support from excluded states in the broader regime and that pushback is directly tied to the exclusion of the NSS. This suggests previously underappreciated costs of minilateral organization and the difficulties that can emerge when minilateral organizations attempt to affect a multilateral regime.

查看原文本刊更多论文

核安全峰会中的偏袒和反弹：原子能机构外核治理的后果

对大型多边组织的不满情绪正在上升，导致一些国家在排他性的“小边”集团中寻求共识。然而，关于这样一个组织如何与更广泛的多边制度相联系的研究很少或根本没有。我以核安全峰会(NSS)为例来考察排除在外的后果。我发现被排除在NSS之外的国家更有可能批评峰会，即使它们与被排除在外的国家有共同的政策偏好。对后续倡议的比较表明，那些与峰会关系更密切的倡议不太可能获得更广泛体制中被排除在外的国家的支持，而这种抵制与将国家安全保障体系排除在外直接相关。这表明以前低估了多边组织的成本，以及当多边组织试图影响多边制度时可能出现的困难。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Security Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Security Studies publishes innovative scholarly manuscripts that make a significant contribution – whether theoretical, empirical, or both – to our understanding of international security. Studies that do not emphasize the causes and consequences of war or the sources and conditions of peace fall outside the journal’s domain. Security Studies features articles that develop, test, and debate theories of international security – that is, articles that address an important research question, display innovation in research, contribute in a novel way to a body of knowledge, and (as appropriate) demonstrate theoretical development with state-of-the art use of appropriate methodological tools. While we encourage authors to discuss the policy implications of their work, articles that are primarily policy-oriented do not fit the journal’s mission. The journal publishes articles that challenge the conventional wisdom in the area of international security studies. Security Studies includes a wide range of topics ranging from nuclear proliferation and deterrence, civil-military relations, strategic culture, ethnic conflicts and their resolution, epidemics and national security, democracy and foreign-policy decision making, developments in qualitative and multi-method research, and the future of security studies.