The Smarthubs integration ladder: a conceptual model for the categorisation of shared mobility hubs

IF 9.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Karst Geurs , Anna Grigolon , Karla Münzel , Konstantinos Gkiotsalitis , David Duran-Rodas , Benjamin Büttner , Christoph Kirchberger , Jesse Pappers , Lluis Martinez Ramirez , Antonia Graf , Julia Hansel , Roxani Gkavra , Roman Klementschitz
{"title":"The Smarthubs integration ladder: a conceptual model for the categorisation of shared mobility hubs","authors":"Karst Geurs ,&nbsp;Anna Grigolon ,&nbsp;Karla Münzel ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Gkiotsalitis ,&nbsp;David Duran-Rodas ,&nbsp;Benjamin Büttner ,&nbsp;Christoph Kirchberger ,&nbsp;Jesse Pappers ,&nbsp;Lluis Martinez Ramirez ,&nbsp;Antonia Graf ,&nbsp;Julia Hansel ,&nbsp;Roxani Gkavra ,&nbsp;Roman Klementschitz","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2023.2239499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A variety of shared mobility hubs, offering shared mobility and other services, have emerged in many cities across the globe. This paper provides a literature review on of the definition and categorisation of shared mobility hubs, guidance for the design of these hubs, and develops a multidimensional typology for shared mobility hubs. The typology, named the SmartHubs Integration Ladder, is based on three integration dimensions: physical, digital, and democratic. The literature review shows that digital and democratic (participation) integration dimensions, and universal design principles are typically missing in shared mobility hub concepts, definitions and planning practice. This implies that existing shared mobility hubs will not reach their full potential in terms of user and societal value. The “smarter” shared mobility hubs are physically, digitally, and democratically, the more user and societal value can potentially be created.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"44 1","pages":"Pages 112-139"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S014416472300082X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A variety of shared mobility hubs, offering shared mobility and other services, have emerged in many cities across the globe. This paper provides a literature review on of the definition and categorisation of shared mobility hubs, guidance for the design of these hubs, and develops a multidimensional typology for shared mobility hubs. The typology, named the SmartHubs Integration Ladder, is based on three integration dimensions: physical, digital, and democratic. The literature review shows that digital and democratic (participation) integration dimensions, and universal design principles are typically missing in shared mobility hub concepts, definitions and planning practice. This implies that existing shared mobility hubs will not reach their full potential in terms of user and societal value. The “smarter” shared mobility hubs are physically, digitally, and democratically, the more user and societal value can potentially be created.

Smarthubs集成阶梯:共享移动中心分类的概念模型
全球许多城市都出现了各种共享交通枢纽,提供共享交通和其他服务。本文对共享交通枢纽的定义和分类进行了文献综述,为这些枢纽的设计提供了指导,并为共享交通枢纽开发了一种多维类型学。该类型学被命名为智能枢纽整合阶梯,基于三个整合维度:物理、数字和民主。文献综述显示,在共享交通枢纽的概念、定义和规划实践中,通常缺少数字和民主(参与)整合维度以及通用设计原则。这意味着现有的共享交通枢纽将无法充分发挥其在用户和社会价值方面的潜力。共享交通枢纽在物理、数字和民主方面越 "智能",就越有可能创造更多的用户和社会价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信