¿Está indicada la irradiación del tumor primario en el estadio IV?

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Barbara Malave , Cecilia Escuin , Miguel Árquez , Olga Engel , Fredy Castaño , Meritxell Arenas
{"title":"¿Está indicada la irradiación del tumor primario en el estadio IV?","authors":"Barbara Malave ,&nbsp;Cecilia Escuin ,&nbsp;Miguel Árquez ,&nbsp;Olga Engel ,&nbsp;Fredy Castaño ,&nbsp;Meritxell Arenas","doi":"10.1016/j.senol.2023.100512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>De-novo metastatic breast cancer is a rare entity, occurring in 3–10% of cases. The most common treatment for these patients is systemic therapy (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapies, and combinations of these). The subgroup of patients with oligometastatic disease and low systemic disease burden may benefit more from adding a locoregional treatment. This literature review aims to analyze the benefits and disadvantages of locoregional treatment in patients with de-novo oligometastatic breast cancer. Retrospective series report that this subgroup of patients may benefit from locoregional treatment, despite presenting with metastatic disease, by improving overall survival and local control. Additionally, several retrospective series have shown that locoregional treatment with surgery, surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, or exclusive radiotherapy present similar results in local control. Therefore, exclusive radiotherapy may be a viable alternative in these patients. In recent years, attempts have been made to demonstrate the trend of retrospective series in prospective trials. These studies have shown great heterogeneity. Some with positive results in improving overall survival and others with negative results, but not statistically significant. The main limitation of retrospective series is the selection bias, which could explain the differences in the results obtained. For this reason, locoregional treatment in these patients should be approached by multidisciplinary teams on an individualized basis, with greater consideration for oligometastatic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38058,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 100512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158223000440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

De-novo metastatic breast cancer is a rare entity, occurring in 3–10% of cases. The most common treatment for these patients is systemic therapy (chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapies, and combinations of these). The subgroup of patients with oligometastatic disease and low systemic disease burden may benefit more from adding a locoregional treatment. This literature review aims to analyze the benefits and disadvantages of locoregional treatment in patients with de-novo oligometastatic breast cancer. Retrospective series report that this subgroup of patients may benefit from locoregional treatment, despite presenting with metastatic disease, by improving overall survival and local control. Additionally, several retrospective series have shown that locoregional treatment with surgery, surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, or exclusive radiotherapy present similar results in local control. Therefore, exclusive radiotherapy may be a viable alternative in these patients. In recent years, attempts have been made to demonstrate the trend of retrospective series in prospective trials. These studies have shown great heterogeneity. Some with positive results in improving overall survival and others with negative results, but not statistically significant. The main limitation of retrospective series is the selection bias, which could explain the differences in the results obtained. For this reason, locoregional treatment in these patients should be approached by multidisciplinary teams on an individualized basis, with greater consideration for oligometastatic patients.

iii期原发肿瘤是否需要放射治疗?
从头转移性乳腺癌是一个罕见的实体,发生在3-10%的病例。这些患者最常见的治疗是全身治疗(化疗、激素治疗、靶向治疗和这些治疗的联合)。少转移性疾病和低全身性疾病负担的患者亚组可能从增加局部区域治疗中获益更多。这篇文献综述的目的是分析局部局部治疗对新生少转移性乳腺癌患者的利弊。回顾性系列报告表明,尽管出现转移性疾病,但该亚组患者可通过改善总体生存和局部控制,从局部治疗中获益。此外,一些回顾性研究表明,局部手术治疗、手术加辅助放疗或单独放疗在局部控制方面的效果相似。因此,在这些患者中,单独放疗可能是一种可行的选择。近年来,人们试图在前瞻性试验中证明回顾性系列的趋势。这些研究显示了很大的异质性。一些在改善总体生存方面有积极的结果,而另一些则有消极的结果,但没有统计学意义。回顾性研究的主要局限性是选择偏倚,这可以解释所获得结果的差异。因此,这些患者的局部局部治疗应由多学科团队在个体化的基础上进行,并更多地考虑少转移患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
63 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信