Examining differences in perceived usability of Google Drive among public library users

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 0 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Farwa Taqi, Syeda Hina Batool, Alia Arshad
{"title":"Examining differences in perceived usability of Google Drive among public library users","authors":"Farwa Taqi, Syeda Hina Batool, Alia Arshad","doi":"10.1108/lht-05-2022-0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to explore differences in the usability of the Google Drive application based on demographic characteristics, computer skills and use frequency of Google Drive among public library users of Lahore.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopted a quantitative approach and survey-based research method to achieve the study's objectives. The cloud usability model (user perspective) has been used as a theoretical lens to guide the study objectives. It comprises five dimensions of usability – capable, personal, reliable, valuable and secure.FindingsThe findings of the study revealed that the usability of Google Drive varied statistically significantly on the basis of depending on the respondents gender, age, academic qualification, computer skills and Google Drive use frequency.Practical implicationsIt is a valuable study since it and adds knowledge to existing literature and has implications for practice.Originality/valueThe findings might be helpful for cloud support teams including Google Drive as they can notice the demographic and other differences among users' perceived usability of Google Drive and can enhance certain features of usability which leads attributes to increase its usage among users.","PeriodicalId":47196,"journal":{"name":"Library Hi Tech","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Hi Tech","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-05-2022-0275","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to explore differences in the usability of the Google Drive application based on demographic characteristics, computer skills and use frequency of Google Drive among public library users of Lahore.Design/methodology/approachThe study adopted a quantitative approach and survey-based research method to achieve the study's objectives. The cloud usability model (user perspective) has been used as a theoretical lens to guide the study objectives. It comprises five dimensions of usability – capable, personal, reliable, valuable and secure.FindingsThe findings of the study revealed that the usability of Google Drive varied statistically significantly on the basis of depending on the respondents gender, age, academic qualification, computer skills and Google Drive use frequency.Practical implicationsIt is a valuable study since it and adds knowledge to existing literature and has implications for practice.Originality/valueThe findings might be helpful for cloud support teams including Google Drive as they can notice the demographic and other differences among users' perceived usability of Google Drive and can enhance certain features of usability which leads attributes to increase its usage among users.
研究谷歌Drive在公共图书馆用户中感知可用性的差异
目的本研究旨在探讨基于人口统计学特征、计算机技能和谷歌Drive使用频率的谷歌Drive应用程序在拉合尔公共图书馆用户中的可用性差异。设计/方法/方法本研究采用定量方法和基于调查的研究方法来实现研究目标。云可用性模型(用户视角)被用作指导研究目标的理论视角。它包括五个维度的可用性-能力,个人,可靠,有价值和安全。研究结果显示,谷歌Drive的可用性根据受访者的性别、年龄、学历、计算机技能和谷歌Drive使用频率的不同而有统计学上的显著差异。这是一项有价值的研究,因为它增加了现有文献的知识,并对实践具有意义。独创性/价值这些发现可能对包括谷歌Drive在内的云支持团队有所帮助,因为他们可以注意到用户对谷歌Drive可用性的感知人口统计学和其他差异,并可以增强可用性的某些特征,从而导致属性增加其在用户中的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Library Hi Tech
Library Hi Tech INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
44.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: ■Integrated library systems ■Networking ■Strategic planning ■Policy implementation across entire institutions ■Security ■Automation systems ■The role of consortia ■Resource access initiatives ■Architecture and technology ■Electronic publishing ■Library technology in specific countries ■User perspectives on technology ■How technology can help disabled library users ■Library-related web sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信