Is Malayo-Polynesian a primary branch of Austronesian?

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Diachronica Pub Date : 2022-05-16 DOI:10.1075/dia.21019.che
Victoria Chen, Jonathan Kuo, Maria Kristina S. Gallego, Isaac Stead
{"title":"Is Malayo-Polynesian a primary branch of Austronesian?","authors":"Victoria Chen, Jonathan Kuo, Maria Kristina S. Gallego, Isaac Stead","doi":"10.1075/dia.21019.che","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n An understudied morphosyntactic innovation, reanalysis of the Proto-Austronesian (PAn) stative intransitive prefix\n *ma- as a transitive affix, offers new insights into Austronesian higher-order subgrouping. Malayo-Polynesian is currently\n considered a primary branch of Austronesian, with no identifiably closer relationship with any linguistic subgroup in the homeland\n (Blust 1999, 2009/2013; Ross 2005). However, the fact that it displays the same innovative use of\n ma- with Amis, Siraya, Kavalan and Basay-Trobiawan and shares the merger of PAn *C/t with this group\n suggests that Malayo-Polynesian and East Formosan may share a common origin – the subgroup that comprises the four languages noted\n above. This observation points to a revised subgrouping more consistent with a socio-historical picture where the out-of-Taiwan\n population descended from a seafaring community expanding to the Batanes and Luzon after having developed a seafaring tradition.\n It also aligns with recent findings in archaeology and genetics that (i) eastern Taiwan is the most likely starting point of\n Austronesian dispersal (Hung 2005, 2008,\n 2019; Bellwood 2017; Bellwood & Dizon\n 2008; Carson & Hung 2018) and (ii) that the Amis bear a significantly\n closer relationship with Austronesian communities outside Taiwan (Capelli et al. 2001;\n Trejaut et al. 2005; McColl et al. 2018;\n Pugach et al. 2021; Tätte et al. 2021).\n Future investigation of additional shared innovations between Malayo-Polynesian and East Formosan could shed further light on\n their interrelationships.","PeriodicalId":44637,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21019.che","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

An understudied morphosyntactic innovation, reanalysis of the Proto-Austronesian (PAn) stative intransitive prefix *ma- as a transitive affix, offers new insights into Austronesian higher-order subgrouping. Malayo-Polynesian is currently considered a primary branch of Austronesian, with no identifiably closer relationship with any linguistic subgroup in the homeland (Blust 1999, 2009/2013; Ross 2005). However, the fact that it displays the same innovative use of ma- with Amis, Siraya, Kavalan and Basay-Trobiawan and shares the merger of PAn *C/t with this group suggests that Malayo-Polynesian and East Formosan may share a common origin – the subgroup that comprises the four languages noted above. This observation points to a revised subgrouping more consistent with a socio-historical picture where the out-of-Taiwan population descended from a seafaring community expanding to the Batanes and Luzon after having developed a seafaring tradition. It also aligns with recent findings in archaeology and genetics that (i) eastern Taiwan is the most likely starting point of Austronesian dispersal (Hung 2005, 2008, 2019; Bellwood 2017; Bellwood & Dizon 2008; Carson & Hung 2018) and (ii) that the Amis bear a significantly closer relationship with Austronesian communities outside Taiwan (Capelli et al. 2001; Trejaut et al. 2005; McColl et al. 2018; Pugach et al. 2021; Tätte et al. 2021). Future investigation of additional shared innovations between Malayo-Polynesian and East Formosan could shed further light on their interrelationships.
马来-波利尼西亚人是南岛人的主要分支吗?
对原始南岛语(PAn)静态不及物前缀*ma-作为及物词缀的重新分析,为南岛语高阶亚群的研究提供了新的见解。马来亚-波利尼西亚语目前被认为是南岛语的一个主要分支,与本土的任何语言分支都没有明显的密切关系(Blust 1999,2009 /2013;罗斯2005)。然而,它与Amis、Siraya语、Kavalan语和Basay-Trobiawan语显示出相同的ma创新用法,并与这一群体共享PAn *C/t的合并,这表明马来亚-波利尼西亚语和东台湾语可能有共同的起源——这一亚群包含了上述四种语言。这一观察指向了一个修订后的亚群,更符合社会历史的画面,即台湾以外的人口来自一个航海社区,在发展航海传统后扩展到巴丹岛和吕宋岛。这也与考古学和遗传学的最新发现相一致,即:(1)台湾东部最有可能是南岛人扩散的起点(Hung 2005, 2008, 2019;Bellwood 2017;Bellwood & dizone 2008;Carson & Hung 2018)和(ii)阿美族与台湾以外的南岛人社区有着更密切的关系(Capelli et al. 2001;Trejaut等人,2005;McColl et al. 2018;Pugach et al. 2021;Tätte et al. 2021)。未来对马来亚-波利尼西亚和东台湾之间共同创新的进一步调查可以进一步阐明它们之间的相互关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diachronica
Diachronica Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Diachronica provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of information concerning all aspects of language change in any and all languages of the globe. Contributions which combine theoretical interest and philological acumen are especially welcome. Diachronica appears three times per year, publishing articles, review articles, book reviews, and a miscellanea section including notes, reports and discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信