Utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment for Occupational Therapy Level I Fieldwork

Q2 Health Professions
Nora Frigo, Emiliy Hanneman, Adrianne Kashale, Margaret Sutton, E. Wright, Vanessa D. Jewell
{"title":"Utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment for Occupational Therapy Level I Fieldwork","authors":"Nora Frigo, Emiliy Hanneman, Adrianne Kashale, Margaret Sutton, E. Wright, Vanessa D. Jewell","doi":"10.18552/IJPBLHSC.V7I1.510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment (OCIA) among occupational therapy students and their perceptions of the use of an occupation-centered approach to design interventions during level I fieldwork. Twenty-five students completed training on the OCIA, used the tool on level 1 fieldwork, and then completed a post-test survey containing closed and open-ended questions. Content analysis was used to analyze open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze quantitative data. Overall, students (N=25) found the OCIA to be a beneficial tool to utilize during fieldwork experiences to recognize and develop interventions from an occupation-centered approach. Currently the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework and models of practice are the primary tools available for student reflection for intervention design. The findings of this study supported the need for a reflection tool to aide in the development and implementation of occupation-centered reasoning during fieldwork experiences.","PeriodicalId":36796,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/IJPBLHSC.V7I1.510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study examined the utility of the Occupation-Centered Intervention Assessment (OCIA) among occupational therapy students and their perceptions of the use of an occupation-centered approach to design interventions during level I fieldwork. Twenty-five students completed training on the OCIA, used the tool on level 1 fieldwork, and then completed a post-test survey containing closed and open-ended questions. Content analysis was used to analyze open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze quantitative data. Overall, students (N=25) found the OCIA to be a beneficial tool to utilize during fieldwork experiences to recognize and develop interventions from an occupation-centered approach. Currently the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework and models of practice are the primary tools available for student reflection for intervention design. The findings of this study supported the need for a reflection tool to aide in the development and implementation of occupation-centered reasoning during fieldwork experiences.
以职业为中心的干预评估在职业治疗一级实地工作中的应用
本研究考察了职业中心干预评估(OCIA)在职业治疗学生中的效用,以及他们在一级实地工作中对使用职业中心方法设计干预措施的看法。25名学生完成了OCIA的培训,在第一级实地工作中使用了该工具,然后完成了一项包含封闭式和开放式问题的测试后调查。采用内容分析法对开放性问题进行分析。定量资料采用描述性统计分析。总体而言,学生(N=25)发现OCIA是一个有益的工具,可以在实地工作经验中使用,以识别和开发以职业为中心的方法的干预措施。目前,职业治疗实践框架和实践模型是学生反思干预设计的主要工具。本研究的结果支持需要一种反思工具,以协助在实地工作经验中发展和实施以职业为中心的推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care
International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书