Price Discovery Mechanism in Unified Market Platform (UMP): A Case Study of APMC Raichur

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS
{"title":"Price Discovery Mechanism in Unified Market Platform (UMP): A Case Study of APMC Raichur","authors":"","doi":"10.35716/ijed/21208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study attempted to analyze how prices were discovered under the e-tending method in the Raichur market, Karnataka, during 2017-18. Correlation, multiple regression and Gini concentration ratio were used to analyse data. The major findings of the study include the e-tendering system under UMP had considerable potential to infuse competition and fetch better prices for farmers; the pricing mechanism of paddy showed there was a clear indication if one bid increases for a lot, there was a 13.8 per cent increase in the price, the numbers of bids per lot and lot size had a positive effect; moisture content had a negative impact on the price of paddy. The study suggested the policy options were: market performance has improved under UMP, so the scope for expansion of e-trading in other markets in Karnataka as well as India, there is a need to create awareness among farmers about to follow quality parameters according to UMP guidelines, and Government needs to strengthen the infrastructure for assaying of agricultural commodities at farm level or community level; Strengthen the IT infrastructure for resolving all UMP related queries of stakeholders in a single window.\n\nKeywords: Assaying, competition, efficiency, price, transparency.\nJEL Codes: M31, O24, Q13","PeriodicalId":43367,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Economics and Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Economics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35716/ijed/21208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study attempted to analyze how prices were discovered under the e-tending method in the Raichur market, Karnataka, during 2017-18. Correlation, multiple regression and Gini concentration ratio were used to analyse data. The major findings of the study include the e-tendering system under UMP had considerable potential to infuse competition and fetch better prices for farmers; the pricing mechanism of paddy showed there was a clear indication if one bid increases for a lot, there was a 13.8 per cent increase in the price, the numbers of bids per lot and lot size had a positive effect; moisture content had a negative impact on the price of paddy. The study suggested the policy options were: market performance has improved under UMP, so the scope for expansion of e-trading in other markets in Karnataka as well as India, there is a need to create awareness among farmers about to follow quality parameters according to UMP guidelines, and Government needs to strengthen the infrastructure for assaying of agricultural commodities at farm level or community level; Strengthen the IT infrastructure for resolving all UMP related queries of stakeholders in a single window. Keywords: Assaying, competition, efficiency, price, transparency. JEL Codes: M31, O24, Q13
统一市场平台中的价格发现机制——以APMC公司为例
该研究试图分析2017-18年期间卡纳塔克邦Raichur市场的电子倾向方法下价格是如何发现的。采用相关性、多元回归、基尼浓度比等方法对数据进行分析。该研究的主要发现包括:非常规农业政策下的电子招标系统具有相当大的潜力,可以注入竞争并为农民获得更好的价格;稻谷的定价机制显示,有一个明显的迹象表明,如果一个出价增加,价格会增加13.8%,每批出价的数量和地块大小都有积极的影响;水分含量对水稻价格有负向影响。研究表明,政策选择是:在非常规货币政策下,市场表现有所改善,因此在卡纳塔克邦和印度的其他市场扩大电子交易的范围;有必要在农民中建立关于遵循非常规货币政策指导方针的质量参数的意识;政府需要加强在农场一级或社区一级分析农产品的基础设施;加强IT基础设施,以便在一个窗口中解决利益相关者的所有UMP相关查询。关键词:分析,竞争,效率,价格,透明度。JEL代码:M31, O24, Q13
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信