Case study of geochemical clustering as a tool for tracing sources of clays for archaeological and modern bricks

IF 0.5 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOLOGY
Baltica Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.5200/baltica.2019.2.2
R. Taraškevičius, V. Kazakauskas, Saulius Sarcevičius, R. Zinkutė, S. Suzdalev
{"title":"Case study of geochemical clustering as a tool for tracing sources of clays for archaeological and modern bricks","authors":"R. Taraškevičius, V. Kazakauskas, Saulius Sarcevičius, R. Zinkutė, S. Suzdalev","doi":"10.5200/baltica.2019.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted using 14 hierarchical clustering ways and combining them with 4 inter-related sets of elements, i.e. the contents of Al, Ba, Ca, Fe, Ga, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Nb, P, Rb, Si, Sr, Th and Ti determined by EDXRF in 44 splits of 10 archaeological and 4 modern bricks, as well as in 38 clay samples from two quarries. Empirical scoring of tree dendrograms of archaeological samples helped to identify Complete Linkage, Weighted Pair Group Average and Ward’s methods as the most suitable for sourcing. Successful identification of geochemical clustering methods for fingerprinting sources of bricks is determined by the intrinsic features of the geochemical composition of stonework or quarries: their similarity, determined by the geochemical peculiarities of clay indicators, such as Al, Rb, Ga, K, Th, Fe, Ti and Nb, and differences, expressed by the elements that are more abundant in sands and silts (Si, Na), carbonates (Ca, Sr, Mg), organic matter (P) and other lithological-mineralogical tracers. It has been found that the mean values of the geochemical composition of the allied objects have much more useful fingerprinting properties. It is strongly recommended for source fingerprinting to select not only typical lithological-mineralogical samples, but also homogeneous sampling sets excluding possible outliers. It has been shown that each raw clay material has its own specific geochemical features. This is an essential useful feature for source fingerprinting using clustering of the objects of interest.","PeriodicalId":55401,"journal":{"name":"Baltica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5200/baltica.2019.2.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The study was conducted using 14 hierarchical clustering ways and combining them with 4 inter-related sets of elements, i.e. the contents of Al, Ba, Ca, Fe, Ga, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Nb, P, Rb, Si, Sr, Th and Ti determined by EDXRF in 44 splits of 10 archaeological and 4 modern bricks, as well as in 38 clay samples from two quarries. Empirical scoring of tree dendrograms of archaeological samples helped to identify Complete Linkage, Weighted Pair Group Average and Ward’s methods as the most suitable for sourcing. Successful identification of geochemical clustering methods for fingerprinting sources of bricks is determined by the intrinsic features of the geochemical composition of stonework or quarries: their similarity, determined by the geochemical peculiarities of clay indicators, such as Al, Rb, Ga, K, Th, Fe, Ti and Nb, and differences, expressed by the elements that are more abundant in sands and silts (Si, Na), carbonates (Ca, Sr, Mg), organic matter (P) and other lithological-mineralogical tracers. It has been found that the mean values of the geochemical composition of the allied objects have much more useful fingerprinting properties. It is strongly recommended for source fingerprinting to select not only typical lithological-mineralogical samples, but also homogeneous sampling sets excluding possible outliers. It has been shown that each raw clay material has its own specific geochemical features. This is an essential useful feature for source fingerprinting using clustering of the objects of interest.
地球化学聚类作为追踪考古和现代砖块粘土来源的工具的案例研究
本研究采用14种分级聚类方法,并将其与4组相互关联的元素相结合,即通过EDXRF在10块考古砖和4块现代砖的44块中以及来自两个采石场的38个粘土样品中测定的Al、Ba、Ca、Fe、Ga、K、Mg、Mn、Na、Nb、P、Rb、Si、Sr、Th和Ti的含量。考古样本树状图的经验评分有助于确定完全连锁、加权配对群平均和沃德方法是最适合采购的方法。砖指纹来源的地球化学聚类方法的成功识别取决于石制品或采石场地球化学成分的内在特征:它们的相似性,取决于粘土指标的地球化学特征,如Al、Rb、Ga、K、Th、Fe、Ti和Nb,以及差异,以沙子和淤泥(Si、Na)、碳酸盐(Ca、Sr、Mg)、有机质(P)和其他岩性矿物学示踪剂中更丰富的元素表示。研究发现,相关天体的地球化学组成的平均值具有更有用的指纹特征。强烈建议源指纹不仅要选择典型的岩性矿物学样本,还要选择排除可能异常值的均质采样集。研究表明,每种粘土原料都有其独特的地球化学特征。这对于使用感兴趣对象集群的源指纹识别来说是一个非常有用的特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Baltica
Baltica 地学-地质学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
6
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BALTICA is an international periodical journal on Earth sciences devoted to the Baltic countries region and the Baltic Sea problems. This edition as a Yearbook is established in 1961 by initiative of Academician Vytautas Gudelis. Since 1993, an Editor-in-Chief of the journal became Academician Algimantas Grigelis. BALTICA is published biannually (in June and December) in cooperation with geoscientists of the circum-Baltic States. BALTICA is publishing original peer-reviewed papers of international interests on various Earth sciences issues. The particular emphasis is given to Quaternary geology, climate changes and development of ecosystems, palaeogeography, environmental geology, as well as stratigraphy, tectonics, sedimentology and surface processes with relevance to the geological history of the Baltic Sea and land areas. Journal emphasizes modern techniques, methodology and standards. The journal structure comprises original articles, short reviews, information, bibliography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信