Evaluation of superior layer configuration of titanium Ti-6Al-4V and aluminium 2024-T3 against soft projectiles

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
K. Senthil, R. Sharma, S. Rupali, A. Thakur, M. Iqbal, N. Gupta
{"title":"Evaluation of superior layer configuration of titanium Ti-6Al-4V and aluminium 2024-T3 against soft projectiles","authors":"K. Senthil, R. Sharma, S. Rupali, A. Thakur, M. Iqbal, N. Gupta","doi":"10.1177/20414196211035789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The manuscript is focussed on the prediction of superior layer configuration on titanium and aluminium plates through numerical investigations using ABAQUS/Explicit finite element software. The target plate of titanium Ti-6Al-4V (Ti) and aluminium Al 2024-T3 (Al) were studied against 7.62 mm diameter soft lead core projectiles. The Johnson-Cook (JC) material model was employed to simulate the behaviour of the target as well as projectile material. The results thus predicted from the numerical simulations in terms of deformed profile, residual velocity and ballistic limit were compared with the experimental results available in literature. Overall, the results were found in good agreement with the experimental results. The simulations were performed on the target of 10, 12.7 and 15 mm thickness with three, five and ten layers in order to predict the superior layer configuration. In the case of Ti-6Al-4V, the difference in performance between three layers and monolithic was quite high, however the use of five or ten layers of equivalent thickness is not advisable as performance is reduced. For Al2024-T3, the performance of layer targets was quite similar to that of monolithic targets. It is also observed the resistance of TiTiAl target configuration found to be better as compared to AlTiTi target configuration. It is concluded that the Al plate as back layer has more efficiency for ballistic resistance of layered configuration. It is also concluded that with respect to thickness, the capacity of titanium target is approximately 1.5 times higher than aluminium target against given lead core projectile.","PeriodicalId":46272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Protective Structures","volume":"12 1","pages":"604 - 635"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20414196211035789","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Protective Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196211035789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The manuscript is focussed on the prediction of superior layer configuration on titanium and aluminium plates through numerical investigations using ABAQUS/Explicit finite element software. The target plate of titanium Ti-6Al-4V (Ti) and aluminium Al 2024-T3 (Al) were studied against 7.62 mm diameter soft lead core projectiles. The Johnson-Cook (JC) material model was employed to simulate the behaviour of the target as well as projectile material. The results thus predicted from the numerical simulations in terms of deformed profile, residual velocity and ballistic limit were compared with the experimental results available in literature. Overall, the results were found in good agreement with the experimental results. The simulations were performed on the target of 10, 12.7 and 15 mm thickness with three, five and ten layers in order to predict the superior layer configuration. In the case of Ti-6Al-4V, the difference in performance between three layers and monolithic was quite high, however the use of five or ten layers of equivalent thickness is not advisable as performance is reduced. For Al2024-T3, the performance of layer targets was quite similar to that of monolithic targets. It is also observed the resistance of TiTiAl target configuration found to be better as compared to AlTiTi target configuration. It is concluded that the Al plate as back layer has more efficiency for ballistic resistance of layered configuration. It is also concluded that with respect to thickness, the capacity of titanium target is approximately 1.5 times higher than aluminium target against given lead core projectile.
Ti-6Al-4V钛合金和2024-T3铝合金抗软弹丸性能评价
本文通过ABAQUS/Explicit有限元软件的数值研究,重点预测了钛板和铝板的上层结构。研究了钛靶板Ti-6Al-4V(Ti)和铝靶板Al2024-T3(Al)对抗7.62 毫米直径的软铅芯弹。Johnson-Cook(JC)材料模型用于模拟目标和抛射材料的行为。将数值模拟在变形轮廓、残余速度和弹道极限方面预测的结果与文献中的实验结果进行了比较。总体而言,结果与实验结果一致。模拟是在10、12.7和15的目标上进行的 mm厚度的三层、五层和十层,以便预测优越的层配置。在Ti-6Al-4V的情况下,三层和单片之间的性能差异相当大,然而,由于性能降低,使用五层或十层等效厚度是不可取的。对于Al2024-T3,层靶的性能与单片靶的性能非常相似。还观察到TiTiAl靶材配置的电阻发现与AlTiTi靶材配置相比更好。结果表明,作为背层的铝板对层状结构的弹道阻力具有更高的效率。还得出结论,就厚度而言,钛靶对抗给定铅芯弹的能力大约是铝靶的1.5倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信