The Combination of NLCR and Enhances the Sepsis-3 Strategy

E. Pranggono, Endah Nurul Aini, Uun Sumardi, Yovita Hartranti, A. Sugianli
{"title":"The Combination of NLCR and Enhances the Sepsis-3 Strategy","authors":"E. Pranggono, Endah Nurul Aini, Uun Sumardi, Yovita Hartranti, A. Sugianli","doi":"10.20473/fmi.v58i2.31051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights:\n\nThe combination of NLCR and PLR will improve the ability to distinguish infection rather than noninfection in the emergency setting for early antibiotic prescribing as well as the sepsis-3 strategy.\nThe diagnostic value of PLR in adult bacterial sepsis patients has never been studied.\n\n \nAbstract:\nAccording to Sepsis-3, antibiotics should be administered in the first hour of diagnosis of sepsis. Still, there is difficulty in differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial infections and a lack of a rapid diagnostic tool to distinguish them. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of NLCR and PLR in suspected bacterial sepsis. The diagnostic value of PLR in adult bacterial sepsis patients has never been studied. This study was a retrospective study from the medical record of Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung. All patients at age ≥ 18 years diagnosed with sepsis based on ICD-10 code and qSOFA ≥ 2 were included. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, positive LR, and AUC of NLCR and PLR. There were 177 patients included in this study. The sensitivity of NLCR was 69.5%, specificity was 34.7%, NPV was 56.9%, PPV was 47.9%, and LR+ was 1.06, while the sensitivity of PLR was 62.2%, specificity was 38.9%, NPV was 54.4%, PPV was 46.8%, and LR+ was 1.02. We obtained cut-off values for NLCR 11.06, AUC 0.500, PLR 222.41, and AUC 0.497. The low value of AUC NLCR and PLR was due to prior antibiotic use. The combination of NLCR and PLR had higher positive LR (1.16) and specificity (54.7%), and also, according to NLCR, we had the highest sensitivity (69.5%). The combination of NLCR and PLR enhances the sepsis-3 strategy because it can be used as screening tools for bacterial sepsis, and antibiotics can also be administered in the first hour of managing sepsis, particularly in the emergency ward.","PeriodicalId":32666,"journal":{"name":"Folia Medica Indonesiana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Medica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/fmi.v58i2.31051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Highlights: The combination of NLCR and PLR will improve the ability to distinguish infection rather than noninfection in the emergency setting for early antibiotic prescribing as well as the sepsis-3 strategy. The diagnostic value of PLR in adult bacterial sepsis patients has never been studied.   Abstract: According to Sepsis-3, antibiotics should be administered in the first hour of diagnosis of sepsis. Still, there is difficulty in differentiating between bacterial and nonbacterial infections and a lack of a rapid diagnostic tool to distinguish them. This study evaluated the diagnostic value of NLCR and PLR in suspected bacterial sepsis. The diagnostic value of PLR in adult bacterial sepsis patients has never been studied. This study was a retrospective study from the medical record of Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung. All patients at age ≥ 18 years diagnosed with sepsis based on ICD-10 code and qSOFA ≥ 2 were included. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, positive LR, and AUC of NLCR and PLR. There were 177 patients included in this study. The sensitivity of NLCR was 69.5%, specificity was 34.7%, NPV was 56.9%, PPV was 47.9%, and LR+ was 1.06, while the sensitivity of PLR was 62.2%, specificity was 38.9%, NPV was 54.4%, PPV was 46.8%, and LR+ was 1.02. We obtained cut-off values for NLCR 11.06, AUC 0.500, PLR 222.41, and AUC 0.497. The low value of AUC NLCR and PLR was due to prior antibiotic use. The combination of NLCR and PLR had higher positive LR (1.16) and specificity (54.7%), and also, according to NLCR, we had the highest sensitivity (69.5%). The combination of NLCR and PLR enhances the sepsis-3 strategy because it can be used as screening tools for bacterial sepsis, and antibiotics can also be administered in the first hour of managing sepsis, particularly in the emergency ward.
NLCR联合强化脓毒症-3策略
亮点:NLCR和PLR的结合将提高在早期抗生素处方和sepsis-3策略的紧急情况下区分感染而非非非感染的能力。PLR在成人细菌性败血症患者中的诊断价值从未被研究过。摘要:根据Sepsis-3,应在诊断败血症的第一个小时使用抗生素。尽管如此,区分细菌性和非细菌性感染仍然存在困难,而且缺乏快速诊断工具来区分它们。本研究评估了NLCR和PLR对疑似细菌性败血症的诊断价值。PLR在成人细菌性败血症患者中的诊断价值从未被研究过。这项研究是对Hasan Sadikin医生万隆医院病历的回顾性研究。纳入所有根据ICD-10代码和qSOFA≥2诊断为败血症的年龄≥18岁的患者。我们计算了NLCR和PLR的敏感性、特异性、NPV、PPV、阳性LR和AUC。本研究共纳入177名患者。NLCR的敏感性为69.5%,特异性为34.7%,NPV为56.9%,PPV为47.9%,LR+为1.06,而PLR的敏感性为62.2%,特异性是38.9%,NPV是54.4%,PPV是46.8%,LR+是1.02。我们获得了NLCR 11.06、AUC 0.500、PLR 222.41和AUC 0.497的截止值。AUC NLCR和PLR的低值是由于以前使用过抗生素。NLCR和PLR的组合具有更高的阳性LR(1.16)和特异性(54.7%),而且根据NLCR,我们的敏感性最高(69.5%)。NLCR和PLL的组合增强了sepsis-3策略,因为它可以用作细菌败血症的筛查工具,并且抗生素也可以在治疗败血症的第一个小时使用,特别是在急诊病房。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信