Ludwig Wittgenstein and Performative Turn

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki Pub Date : 2020-08-03 DOI:10.5840/eps202057339

A. Moiseeva, A. Zaykova

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a response to the thesis of K.A. Rodin about the exclusively conceptual influence of Wittgenstein and the problem of following the rule on social research. The authors argue that along with the methodological line traced by K.A. Rodin, one should single out a purely scientific line of influence of Wittgenstein's ideas, the result of which was the so-called performative turn in social sciences.

查看原文本刊更多论文

路德维希·维特根斯坦与表演转向

这篇文章是对K.a.罗丹关于维特根斯坦纯粹的概念影响和遵循社会研究规则问题的论文的回应。作者认为，除了K.A.罗丹所追溯的方法论路线外，还应该挑出维特根斯坦思想的纯粹科学影响路线，其结果就是社会科学中所谓的表演转向。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science-Epistemologiya i Filosofiya Nauki PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Epistemology & Philosophy of Science is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal established in 2004 by the Institute of Philosophy (Russian Academy of Sciences). It is devoted to the themes in modern epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind. The journal supports the policy of interdisciplinarity. It’s based on the belief that the comprehensive analysis of cultural phenomena couldn’t be completed without focusing on the problems of cognition. The epistemological analysis, however, needs the research results from human, social and natural sciences. Sections of the journal: 1.Editorial 2.Panel Discussion 3.Epistemology and Cognition 4.Language and Mind 5.Vista 6.Case Studies -Science Studies 7.Interdisciplinary Studies 8.Archive 9.Symposium 10.Book Reviews