African Somaesthetics: Cultures, Feminisms, Politics, edited by Catherine F. Botha

IF 0.1 0 ART
I. Bronner
{"title":"African Somaesthetics: Cultures, Feminisms, Politics, edited by Catherine F. Botha","authors":"I. Bronner","doi":"10.1080/00043389.2021.1955189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An interdisciplinary philosophical approach akin to hermeneutics and phenomenology, somaesthetics was introduced by pragmatist philosopher Richard Schusterman (who is also Brill’s series editor) as “[t]he critical study and meliorative cultivation of how we experience and use the living body (or soma) as a site of sensory appreciation (aesthesis) and creative self-fashioning” (Schusterman 2012, 34). This volume’s editor, Catherine F. Botha, argues for “the significance of the corporeal” (p. 2) and states that “in its rejection of the somatophobia that characterises most philosophical traditions, somaesthetics aims to re-evaluate the human body and its role in the living of a fulfilled life” (p. 3). Botha highlights that this third volume in Brill’s Studies in Somaesthetics series is the first attempt to bring together original research on somaesthetics within African contexts (rather than Western or Eastern contexts). She positions Schusterman’s pragmatic focus on relativist social practices and political experimentation as ideally suitable to “specifically interrogating the possibilities of the contribution of a somaesthetic approach in the context of colonization, decolonization, and globalization in Africa” (p. 2). Not being able to offer an informed critique of either somaesthetics as a philosophical approach, nor the volume’s contribution to the existing literature on somaesthetics, my focus in this review will be on its potential interest to an audience in the visual and performing arts.","PeriodicalId":40908,"journal":{"name":"De Arte","volume":"56 1","pages":"103 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00043389.2021.1955189","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043389.2021.1955189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An interdisciplinary philosophical approach akin to hermeneutics and phenomenology, somaesthetics was introduced by pragmatist philosopher Richard Schusterman (who is also Brill’s series editor) as “[t]he critical study and meliorative cultivation of how we experience and use the living body (or soma) as a site of sensory appreciation (aesthesis) and creative self-fashioning” (Schusterman 2012, 34). This volume’s editor, Catherine F. Botha, argues for “the significance of the corporeal” (p. 2) and states that “in its rejection of the somatophobia that characterises most philosophical traditions, somaesthetics aims to re-evaluate the human body and its role in the living of a fulfilled life” (p. 3). Botha highlights that this third volume in Brill’s Studies in Somaesthetics series is the first attempt to bring together original research on somaesthetics within African contexts (rather than Western or Eastern contexts). She positions Schusterman’s pragmatic focus on relativist social practices and political experimentation as ideally suitable to “specifically interrogating the possibilities of the contribution of a somaesthetic approach in the context of colonization, decolonization, and globalization in Africa” (p. 2). Not being able to offer an informed critique of either somaesthetics as a philosophical approach, nor the volume’s contribution to the existing literature on somaesthetics, my focus in this review will be on its potential interest to an audience in the visual and performing arts.
《非洲躯体美学:文化、女权主义、政治》,凯瑟琳·f·博塔主编
一种类似于解释学和现象学的跨学科哲学方法,实用主义哲学家Richard Schusterman(也是Brill的系列编辑)介绍了躯体美学,称其为“对我们如何体验和使用活体(或躯体)作为感官欣赏(美学)和创造性自我塑造的场所的批判性研究和改进性培养”(Schusterman 2012,34)。本卷的编辑Catherine F.Botha主张“物质的意义”(第2页),并指出“在拒绝大多数哲学传统所特有的躯体恐惧症的过程中,躯体美学旨在重新评估人体及其在充实生活中的作用”(第3页)。博塔强调,Brill的《身体美学研究》系列的第三卷是第一次尝试将非洲背景下(而不是西方或东方背景下)的身体美学原创研究结合在一起。她认为,舒斯特曼对相对主义社会实践和政治实验的务实关注非常适合“在非洲殖民化、非殖民化和全球化的背景下,具体探讨身体美学方法的贡献的可能性”(第2页)。由于无法对作为哲学方法的躯体美学进行知情的批评,也无法对该卷对现有躯体美学文献的贡献进行知情的评论,我在这篇综述中的重点将放在观众对视觉和表演艺术的潜在兴趣上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
De Arte
De Arte ART-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信