Interpretation of the Nature of Dementia in a Context of Humanism and Transhumanism Polemic

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
A. Sidenkova, V. Myakotnykh, Mariia Ivanchenko
{"title":"Interpretation of the Nature of Dementia in a Context of Humanism and Transhumanism Polemic","authors":"A. Sidenkova, V. Myakotnykh, Mariia Ivanchenko","doi":"10.21146/0042-8744-2023-2-68-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the phenomenon of dementia from the point of view of two approaches: humanism and transhumanism. The psychological and philosophi­cal interpretation of this neurodegenerative disease is given by the example of works of such philosophers and scientists as: I. Kant, M. Heidegger, E. Hus­serl, Aristotle, V.E. Frankl, D.J. Chalmers, K. Charmaz, T. Kitwood, M.P. Lauren­tiu, E. van Wijngaarden, F. Svenaeus, Ch. Taylor, S. Post, A. Giddens, E. Cassel, C. Gilleard. The analysis of general philosophical terms “mind”, “consciousness”, “intentionality”, “human”, “human nature”, “image of human”, “nothingness” is carried out. The work examines the prospects for the treatment and prevention of dementia using the achievements of NBIС-technologies, as well as the meth­ods proposed by transhumanism: the creation of an exocortex, genetic editing, digitization of consciousness, cyborgization of an individual, cloning, organ grow­ing and other methods. Inseparable from neurodegenerative and mental diseases, the phenomena of stigmatization, as well as nothingness (nihilation as a process) in the Heideggerian sense of the word, are studied. The criticism of transhuman­ism and humanism is consistently carried out in relation to the effectiveness of treatment of mental illness in general and dementia in particular. The right of transhumanism to invade the sphere of moral and ethical imperatives, medical practice and deontology, as well as human self-identity and rationality is as­sessed. The understanding of such phenomena as pain, illness, suffering and death is carried out in the context of a discussion between the humanistic para­digm and the transhumanistic vision of the world. The process of renewal of hu­manism and the transition to antihumanism or metahumanism are assumed to be the determining factors in the further development of philosophical thought, in its mutual influence on science, medicine and technology.","PeriodicalId":46795,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY FILOSOFII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-2-68-78","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the phenomenon of dementia from the point of view of two approaches: humanism and transhumanism. The psychological and philosophi­cal interpretation of this neurodegenerative disease is given by the example of works of such philosophers and scientists as: I. Kant, M. Heidegger, E. Hus­serl, Aristotle, V.E. Frankl, D.J. Chalmers, K. Charmaz, T. Kitwood, M.P. Lauren­tiu, E. van Wijngaarden, F. Svenaeus, Ch. Taylor, S. Post, A. Giddens, E. Cassel, C. Gilleard. The analysis of general philosophical terms “mind”, “consciousness”, “intentionality”, “human”, “human nature”, “image of human”, “nothingness” is carried out. The work examines the prospects for the treatment and prevention of dementia using the achievements of NBIС-technologies, as well as the meth­ods proposed by transhumanism: the creation of an exocortex, genetic editing, digitization of consciousness, cyborgization of an individual, cloning, organ grow­ing and other methods. Inseparable from neurodegenerative and mental diseases, the phenomena of stigmatization, as well as nothingness (nihilation as a process) in the Heideggerian sense of the word, are studied. The criticism of transhuman­ism and humanism is consistently carried out in relation to the effectiveness of treatment of mental illness in general and dementia in particular. The right of transhumanism to invade the sphere of moral and ethical imperatives, medical practice and deontology, as well as human self-identity and rationality is as­sessed. The understanding of such phenomena as pain, illness, suffering and death is carried out in the context of a discussion between the humanistic para­digm and the transhumanistic vision of the world. The process of renewal of hu­manism and the transition to antihumanism or metahumanism are assumed to be the determining factors in the further development of philosophical thought, in its mutual influence on science, medicine and technology.
从人道主义和跨人道主义的视角解读痴呆的本质
本文从人本主义和超人本主义两个角度来考察痴呆现象。这种神经退行性疾病的心理学和哲学解释以哲学家和科学家的著作为例,如:I·康德、M·海德格尔、E·胡塞尔、亚里士多德、V·E·弗兰克尔、D·J·查尔默斯、K·查马兹、T·基特伍德、M·P·劳伦提、E·范·维恩加德、F.Svenaeus、Ch.Taylor、S.Post、A.Giddens、E.卡塞尔、C.Gilleard。对一般哲学术语“心”、“意识”、“意向性”、“人”、“人性”、“人类形象”、“虚无”进行了分析。这项工作考察了利用NBIС技术的成就以及跨人类主义提出的方法治疗和预防痴呆症的前景:创造外皮层、基因编辑、意识数字化、个体的半机械人化、克隆、器官生长和其他方法。与神经退行性疾病和精神疾病不可分割的是,我们研究了污名化现象,以及海德格尔意义上的虚无(作为一个过程的污名化)。对超人类主义和人道主义的批评一直与治疗一般精神疾病特别是痴呆症的有效性有关。跨人类主义侵犯道德和伦理要求、医学实践和义务生物学以及人类自我认同和理性领域的权利受到了评估。对痛苦、疾病、苦难和死亡等现象的理解是在人文主义范式和超人文主义世界观之间的讨论背景下进行的。胡人主义的更新和向反人主义或元人主义的转变被认为是哲学思想进一步发展的决定因素,它对科学、医学和技术产生了相互影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VOPROSY FILOSOFII
VOPROSY FILOSOFII PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: "Вопросы философии" - академическое научное издание, центральный философский журнал в России. В настоящее время является органом Президиума Российской Академии Наук. Журнал "Вопросы философии" исторически тесно связан с Институтом философии РАН. Выходит ежемесячно. Журнал был основан в июле 1947 г. Интернет-версия журнала запущена в мае 2009 года.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信