Qual è la professional vision degli educatori? Problemi, pratiche ed implicazioni (inter)professionali

Q4 Social Sciences
Marzia Saglietti
{"title":"Qual è la professional vision degli educatori? Problemi, pratiche ed implicazioni (inter)professionali","authors":"Marzia Saglietti","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1825-8670/10422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social educators’ professional vision has been rarely “viewed” as a social organized way of seeing and understanding pedagogical events. Drawing on several episodes coming from consultancies in the socio-educational field (involving children’s homes and socio-educational centers for children and vulnerable families), in this article I analyze many prob-lematic issues connected with the lack of awareness pertaining social educators’ professional vision: what I call the adoption of “medical epistemologies”, the (double) adoption of other professional visions, the educators’ epistemic rigidity constraining themselves as “executors of other sights”, with various practical implications in terms of interprofessional relationships and communication. This material constitutes an arena of discussion pertaining epistemologi-cal, theoretical and methodological implications, and can be useful for a more mature and aware pedagogical observation. In the conclusions, I propose the adoption of a bi-univocal and participative approach to the observation phase, a recursive relationship with educational plans and activities and an informed choice over epistemological, theoretical-methodological references and the adoption of a knowledgeable theory of change. These steps can prove to be useful instruments in order to understand social educators’ professional vision(s).","PeriodicalId":38147,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopaideia","volume":"24 1","pages":"43-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encyclopaideia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1825-8670/10422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social educators’ professional vision has been rarely “viewed” as a social organized way of seeing and understanding pedagogical events. Drawing on several episodes coming from consultancies in the socio-educational field (involving children’s homes and socio-educational centers for children and vulnerable families), in this article I analyze many prob-lematic issues connected with the lack of awareness pertaining social educators’ professional vision: what I call the adoption of “medical epistemologies”, the (double) adoption of other professional visions, the educators’ epistemic rigidity constraining themselves as “executors of other sights”, with various practical implications in terms of interprofessional relationships and communication. This material constitutes an arena of discussion pertaining epistemologi-cal, theoretical and methodological implications, and can be useful for a more mature and aware pedagogical observation. In the conclusions, I propose the adoption of a bi-univocal and participative approach to the observation phase, a recursive relationship with educational plans and activities and an informed choice over epistemological, theoretical-methodological references and the adoption of a knowledgeable theory of change. These steps can prove to be useful instruments in order to understand social educators’ professional vision(s).
教育工作者的职业愿景是什么?职业问题、实践和影响
社会教育者的专业视野很少被“视为”一种观察和理解教学事件的社会组织方式。根据社会教育领域(涉及儿童之家和儿童和弱势家庭的社会教育中心)咨询公司的几起事件,本文分析了许多与缺乏对社会教育者专业愿景的认识有关的问题:我称之为“医学认识论”的采用,其他专业视野的(双重)采用,教育者的认识论刚性约束他们自己作为“其他视野的执行者”,在跨专业关系和交流方面具有各种实际意义。这些材料构成了一个关于认识论、理论和方法论含义的讨论舞台,对于更成熟和更有意识的教学观察是有用的。在结论中,我建议在观察阶段采用一种双向的、参与式的方法,一种与教育计划和活动的递归关系,一种对认识论、理论方法参考的知情选择,以及一种知识变革理论的采用。这些步骤可以被证明是有用的工具,以了解社会教育者的专业愿景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Encyclopaideia
Encyclopaideia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信