Russian Philosophers on the Concept of a Scientific Worldview

V. B. Aleksandrov
{"title":"Russian Philosophers on the Concept of a Scientific Worldview","authors":"V. B. Aleksandrov","doi":"10.22394/1726-1139-2023-2-90-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   The article shows the controversiality of the concept of “scientific worldview.” It indicates its connection with the ideology of Marxism, which claimed to reflect the objective laws of social development. The idea is made that within the framework of this approach, the understanding of the worldview as a source of personal meanings gives way to its vision as a combination of principles of socially significant activity. This approach is opposed to the position of Russian philosophers who criticized the concept of a scientific worldview and pointed out that the source of personal meanings that make up the content of the worldview is the life experience of the subject, understood as irrational introduction to being. To express such an introduction to being, the concepts of “world sense” and “world consciousness” used by Berdyaev can be used. Conceptual, scientific worldview means the attitude to reality as something external, otherworldly, i. e. is the position of substance. Science, according to Berdyaev, is knowledge of necessity through adaptation to world given and knowledge of necessity. To fill the meaning of the inner life of a person, a specific being of a person plays a decisive role, which acts as a form of rooting in being as such. In other words, a person acquires the main meanings of his existence not on the basis of a worldview, the content of which is a generalized image of the outside world, they are acquired from his own experience of spiritual growth, which constitutes the essential basis of life.","PeriodicalId":33085,"journal":{"name":"Upravlencheskoe konsul''tirovanie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlencheskoe konsul''tirovanie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2023-2-90-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   The article shows the controversiality of the concept of “scientific worldview.” It indicates its connection with the ideology of Marxism, which claimed to reflect the objective laws of social development. The idea is made that within the framework of this approach, the understanding of the worldview as a source of personal meanings gives way to its vision as a combination of principles of socially significant activity. This approach is opposed to the position of Russian philosophers who criticized the concept of a scientific worldview and pointed out that the source of personal meanings that make up the content of the worldview is the life experience of the subject, understood as irrational introduction to being. To express such an introduction to being, the concepts of “world sense” and “world consciousness” used by Berdyaev can be used. Conceptual, scientific worldview means the attitude to reality as something external, otherworldly, i. e. is the position of substance. Science, according to Berdyaev, is knowledge of necessity through adaptation to world given and knowledge of necessity. To fill the meaning of the inner life of a person, a specific being of a person plays a decisive role, which acts as a form of rooting in being as such. In other words, a person acquires the main meanings of his existence not on the basis of a worldview, the content of which is a generalized image of the outside world, they are acquired from his own experience of spiritual growth, which constitutes the essential basis of life.
俄国哲学家关于科学世界观的概念
本文论述了“科学世界观”概念的争议性,指出其与马克思主义意识形态的联系,马克思主义意识形态主张反映社会发展的客观规律。有人认为,在这种方法的框架内,对世界观作为个人意义来源的理解让位于其作为社会意义活动原则组合的愿景。这种方法与俄罗斯哲学家的立场相反,他们批评了科学世界观的概念,并指出构成世界观内容的个人意义的来源是主体的生活体验,被理解为对存在的非理性介绍。为了表达对存在的这种介绍,可以使用别尔捷夫使用的“世界感”和“世界意识”的概念。概念的、科学的世界观意味着对现实的态度是外在的、超凡脱俗的,即物质的地位。根据Berdyaev的观点,科学是通过适应给定的世界和对必要性的认识来认识必要性。为了填补一个人内心生活的意义,一个人的特定存在起着决定性的作用,它是一种植根于自身的形式。换言之,一个人不是在世界观的基础上获得其存在的主要意义,世界观的内容是外部世界的广义形象,这些意义是从他自己的精神成长经历中获得的,而精神成长经历构成了生命的本质基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信