Situational, Community, and State Policy-Level Factors Associated with Arrest in Incidents of Intimate Partner Violence

Q1 Social Sciences
M. Beeble, Adrienne E Adams, Kyungsook Lee
{"title":"Situational, Community, and State Policy-Level Factors Associated with Arrest in Incidents of Intimate Partner Violence","authors":"M. Beeble, Adrienne E Adams, Kyungsook Lee","doi":"10.1177/07340168221115407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored situational-, community-, and state policy-level factors associated with arrest in incidents involving violence among heterosexual couples. We employed 3-level regression models with Bayesian estimation to determine factors that influence female-only arrest, male-only arrest, and dual arrest, compared to incidents resulting in no arrest. At the situational level, differences by offense type were seen. The odds of a male’s arrest were significantly higher across all offense types, except for sexual assault, larceny, and fraud. The odds of a female partner's arrest were significantly higher across all offenses except larceny, robbery, and fraud. The odds of dual arrest were significantly higher in incidents involving simple assault, aggravated assault, intimidation, but not sexual assault, kidnapping, property crime, larceny, and robbery. The odds of arrest were higher across the board among incidents involving a victim injury, a weapon, mutual violence, and perpetrator substance use. At the community level, few factors were related to arrest. At the state policy level, mandatory arrest statutes increased the odds of a single arrest in comparison to jurisdictions with officer discretion, regardless of perpetrator sex, but had no impact on dual arrest. Primary aggressor policies were unrelated to arrest outcomes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":40065,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"377 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168221115407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored situational-, community-, and state policy-level factors associated with arrest in incidents involving violence among heterosexual couples. We employed 3-level regression models with Bayesian estimation to determine factors that influence female-only arrest, male-only arrest, and dual arrest, compared to incidents resulting in no arrest. At the situational level, differences by offense type were seen. The odds of a male’s arrest were significantly higher across all offense types, except for sexual assault, larceny, and fraud. The odds of a female partner's arrest were significantly higher across all offenses except larceny, robbery, and fraud. The odds of dual arrest were significantly higher in incidents involving simple assault, aggravated assault, intimidation, but not sexual assault, kidnapping, property crime, larceny, and robbery. The odds of arrest were higher across the board among incidents involving a victim injury, a weapon, mutual violence, and perpetrator substance use. At the community level, few factors were related to arrest. At the state policy level, mandatory arrest statutes increased the odds of a single arrest in comparison to jurisdictions with officer discretion, regardless of perpetrator sex, but had no impact on dual arrest. Primary aggressor policies were unrelated to arrest outcomes. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
与亲密伴侣暴力事件中逮捕相关的情境、社区和国家政策层面因素
这项研究探讨了在异性恋夫妇暴力事件中与逮捕相关的情境、社区和国家政策层面的因素。我们采用了带有贝叶斯估计的三级回归模型,以确定与未导致逮捕的事件相比,影响仅女性逮捕、仅男性逮捕和双重逮捕的因素。在情境层面,可以看出不同进攻类型的差异。除性侵、盗窃和欺诈外,所有犯罪类型中男性被捕的几率都要高得多。除盗窃、抢劫和欺诈外,女性伴侣被捕的几率在所有犯罪中都要高得多。在涉及简单袭击、严重袭击、恐吓的事件中,双重逮捕的几率要高得多,但不包括性侵、绑架、财产犯罪、盗窃和抢劫。在涉及受害者受伤、武器、相互暴力和犯罪者使用药物的事件中,被捕的几率更高。在社区一级,很少有因素与逮捕有关。在国家政策层面,与具有官员自由裁量权的司法管辖区相比,无论犯罪者的性别如何,强制性逮捕法规都增加了单次逮捕的几率,但对双重逮捕没有影响。主要侵略者政策与逮捕结果无关。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminal Justice Review
Criminal Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminal Justice Review is a scholarly journal dedicated to presenting a broad perspective on criminal justice issues. It focuses on any aspect of crime and the justice system and can feature local, state, or national concerns. Both qualitative and quantitative pieces are encouraged, providing that they adhere to standards of quality scholarship. As a peer-reviewed journal, we encourage the submission of articles, research notes, commentaries, and comprehensive essays that focus on crime and broadly defined justice-related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信