Comparative Analysis of Aerobic Composting of Fresh Cut Floral Waste

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Coleman L. Etheredge, T. M. Waliczek
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Aerobic Composting of Fresh Cut Floral Waste","authors":"Coleman L. Etheredge, T. M. Waliczek","doi":"10.24266/2573-5586-40.3.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Increased levels of pesticide applications are used when growing cut flowers in many developing countries where most are grown and where they are less restrictive on pesticide use when compared to regulations in the United States. Therefore, special consideration should be given to cut flower disposal from floral shops that utilize flowers from other countries due to the potential for pesticide leaching into land and waterways. Most retail florists in the industry dispose of their floral waste in municipal dumpsters. While the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has stringent guidelines to prevent the importation of insect and disease pests, there are no regulations regarding residual pesticides or other harmful chemical contamination on imported floral crops. Composting is one technique used as an alternative waste management method to traditional landfill dumping and can produce a valuable commodity for agricultural, horticultural, and related industries. The main objectives of this study were to compare the physicochemical properties of two different compost protocols that incorporated cut flower and foliage waste and to determine whether pesticide residues remained in the finished compost. Analysis of results were based on the U.S. Composting Council's Tests Methods for the Examination of Composting and Compost used by the U.S. Composting Council's Seal of Testing Approval (STA) program. When compared to STA standards, both compost samples pH, total nitrogen, C:N ratio, and bioassay were found to be within normal ranges for compost sold in the horticulture industry. Chemical analysis found the levels of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, zinc all to be well below set industry standards. Additionally, the compost was tested for 23 herbicides and insecticides. Of those, two herbicides (clopyralid and MCPA) and one insecticide (lufenuron) were found in the sample in trace amounts, though well below USDA standards for food crops after the composting process. Results indicated floral waste collected from retail flower shops has the potential to be incorporated into a composting system to create a quality compost suitable for use in the horticulture industry.","PeriodicalId":15780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental horticulture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24266/2573-5586-40.3.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increased levels of pesticide applications are used when growing cut flowers in many developing countries where most are grown and where they are less restrictive on pesticide use when compared to regulations in the United States. Therefore, special consideration should be given to cut flower disposal from floral shops that utilize flowers from other countries due to the potential for pesticide leaching into land and waterways. Most retail florists in the industry dispose of their floral waste in municipal dumpsters. While the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has stringent guidelines to prevent the importation of insect and disease pests, there are no regulations regarding residual pesticides or other harmful chemical contamination on imported floral crops. Composting is one technique used as an alternative waste management method to traditional landfill dumping and can produce a valuable commodity for agricultural, horticultural, and related industries. The main objectives of this study were to compare the physicochemical properties of two different compost protocols that incorporated cut flower and foliage waste and to determine whether pesticide residues remained in the finished compost. Analysis of results were based on the U.S. Composting Council's Tests Methods for the Examination of Composting and Compost used by the U.S. Composting Council's Seal of Testing Approval (STA) program. When compared to STA standards, both compost samples pH, total nitrogen, C:N ratio, and bioassay were found to be within normal ranges for compost sold in the horticulture industry. Chemical analysis found the levels of arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, zinc all to be well below set industry standards. Additionally, the compost was tested for 23 herbicides and insecticides. Of those, two herbicides (clopyralid and MCPA) and one insecticide (lufenuron) were found in the sample in trace amounts, though well below USDA standards for food crops after the composting process. Results indicated floral waste collected from retail flower shops has the potential to be incorporated into a composting system to create a quality compost suitable for use in the horticulture industry.
鲜切花卉废弃物好氧堆肥的对比分析
与美国的法规相比,许多发展中国家在种植切花时使用了更多的杀虫剂,这些国家种植的大多数都是切花,而且对杀虫剂使用的限制较少。因此,由于农药可能渗入土地和水道,应特别考虑从使用其他国家花卉的花店处理切花。该行业的大多数零售花店都在市政垃圾箱中处理他们的花卉垃圾。虽然美国农业部(USDA)有严格的指导方针来防止病虫害的进口,但没有关于进口花卉作物残留农药或其他有害化学污染的规定。堆肥是一种替代传统垃圾填埋场倾倒的废物管理方法,可以为农业、园艺和相关行业生产有价值的商品。本研究的主要目的是比较两种不同堆肥方案的理化性质,这两种堆肥方案包含了切花和树叶垃圾,并确定最终堆肥中是否残留有农药残留。结果分析基于美国堆肥委员会测试批准印章(STA)计划使用的美国堆肥委员会堆肥和堆肥测试方法。与STA标准相比,发现两种堆肥样品的pH、总氮、C:N比和生物测定都在园艺行业销售的堆肥的正常范围内。化学分析发现,砷、镉、铜、铅、汞、钼、镍、硒和锌的含量都远低于既定的行业标准。此外,对堆肥进行了23种除草剂和杀虫剂的测试。其中,在样本中发现了两种除草剂(氯吡喃和MCPA)和一种杀虫剂(鲁芬脲)的微量,尽管在堆肥过程后远低于美国农业部对粮食作物的标准。结果表明,从零售花店收集的花卉废物有可能被纳入堆肥系统,以产生适合园艺行业使用的优质堆肥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental horticulture
Journal of environmental horticulture Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信