Hard Work Makes It Hard to Sleep: Work Characteristics Link to Multidimensional Sleep Health Phenotypes.

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Journal of Business and Psychology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1007/s10869-023-09882-y
Claire E Smith, Soomi Lee, Tammy D Allen
{"title":"Hard Work Makes It Hard to Sleep: Work Characteristics Link to Multidimensional Sleep Health Phenotypes.","authors":"Claire E Smith, Soomi Lee, Tammy D Allen","doi":"10.1007/s10869-023-09882-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Work is closely intertwined with employees' sleep quantity and quality, with consequences for well-being and productivity. Yet despite the conceptualization of sleep health as a multidimensional pattern of various sleep characteristics, little is known about workers' experiences of the diverse range of sleep health dimensions (e.g., sleep regularity, daytime alertness, and sleep efficiency in addition to quantity and quality) proposed by contemporary frameworks. The present study integrates modern sleep frameworks with the Job Demands-Control-Support Model to describe common multidimensional sleep health phenotypes among employees and their associations with job characteristics. Across two national samples (<i>N</i> <sub>1</sub> = 2353; <i>N</i> <sub>2</sub> = 1260) of working adults from the Midlife in the United States study, latent class analysis indicated three common sleep health phenotypes: (1) <i>good sleepers</i> who exhibit good sleep across all dimensions, (2) <i>catch-up sleepers</i> who sleep longer on non-workdays and shorter on workdays but exhibit otherwise good sleep, and (3) <i>short, dissatisfied, inefficient, and irregular sleepers</i> (SDIIs) who were suboptimal across four of the five measured sleep health dimensions. Good sleepers reported low job demands, high control, and high support (similar to a low-strain job). Catch-up sleepers reported high job control and moderate demands and support (similar to an active job). SDIIs reported high demands, low control, and low support (similar to a high-strain job). We discuss implications for job characteristics theories, sleep health frameworks, and practical management of employee sleep when measured as a multidimensional pattern of sleep health experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"393-410"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09882-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work is closely intertwined with employees' sleep quantity and quality, with consequences for well-being and productivity. Yet despite the conceptualization of sleep health as a multidimensional pattern of various sleep characteristics, little is known about workers' experiences of the diverse range of sleep health dimensions (e.g., sleep regularity, daytime alertness, and sleep efficiency in addition to quantity and quality) proposed by contemporary frameworks. The present study integrates modern sleep frameworks with the Job Demands-Control-Support Model to describe common multidimensional sleep health phenotypes among employees and their associations with job characteristics. Across two national samples (N 1 = 2353; N 2 = 1260) of working adults from the Midlife in the United States study, latent class analysis indicated three common sleep health phenotypes: (1) good sleepers who exhibit good sleep across all dimensions, (2) catch-up sleepers who sleep longer on non-workdays and shorter on workdays but exhibit otherwise good sleep, and (3) short, dissatisfied, inefficient, and irregular sleepers (SDIIs) who were suboptimal across four of the five measured sleep health dimensions. Good sleepers reported low job demands, high control, and high support (similar to a low-strain job). Catch-up sleepers reported high job control and moderate demands and support (similar to an active job). SDIIs reported high demands, low control, and low support (similar to a high-strain job). We discuss implications for job characteristics theories, sleep health frameworks, and practical management of employee sleep when measured as a multidimensional pattern of sleep health experiences.

Abstract Image

工作辛苦导致睡眠困难:工作特征与多维睡眠健康表型相关
工作与员工的睡眠数量和质量密切相关,进而影响员工的幸福感和工作效率。然而,尽管将睡眠健康概念化为各种睡眠特征的多维模式,但人们对当代框架提出的各种睡眠健康维度(例如,睡眠规律、白天警觉性和睡眠效率,以及睡眠数量和质量)的工人体验知之甚少。本研究将现代睡眠框架与工作需求-控制-支持模型相结合,描述了员工常见的多维睡眠健康表型及其与工作特征的关联。在两个国家样本中(N 1 = 2353;N 2 = 1260)来自美国中年研究的工作成年人,潜在类别分析显示了三种常见的睡眠健康表型:(1)在所有维度都表现出良好睡眠的良好睡眠者,(2)在非工作日睡眠时间较长,工作日睡眠时间较短,但在其他方面表现出良好睡眠的追赶睡眠者,以及(3)在五个测量的睡眠健康维度中的四个维度中表现不佳的短,不满意,低效和不规则睡眠者(SDIIs)。睡眠好的人工作要求低,控制力强,支持度高(类似于低压力的工作)。补觉者对工作的控制程度较高,对工作的要求和支持程度适中(类似于主动工作)。sdi报告高要求、低控制和低支持(类似于高压力的工作)。我们讨论了工作特征理论、睡眠健康框架和员工睡眠作为睡眠健康体验的多维模式的实际管理的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business and Psychology (JBP) is an international outlet publishing high quality research designed to advance organizational science and practice. Since its inception in 1986, the journal has published impactful scholarship in Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Organizational Behavior, Human Resources Management, Work Psychology, Occupational Psychology, and Vocational Psychology. Typical subject matters include Team processes and effectiveness Customer service and satisfaction Employee recruitment, selection, and promotion Employee engagement and withdrawal Organizational culture and climate Training, development and coaching Mentoring and socialization Performance management, appraisal and feedback Workplace diversity Leadership Workplace health, stress, and safety Employee attitudes and satisfaction Careers and retirement Organizational communication Technology and work Employee motivation and job design Organizational change and development Employee citizenship and deviance Organizational effectiveness Work-nonwork/work-family Rigorous quantitative, qualitative, field-based, and lab-based empirical studies are welcome. Interdisciplinary scholarship is valued and encouraged. Submitted manuscripts should be well-grounded conceptually and make meaningful contributions to scientific understandingsand/or the advancement of science-based practice. The Journal of Business and Psychology is - A high quality/impactful outlet for organizational science research - A journal dedicated to bridging the science/practice divide - A journal striving to create interdisciplinary connections For details on submitting manuscripts, please read the author guidelines found in the far right menu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信