Anterolateral thigh harvesting for head and neck reconstruction without Doppler: Risky or not?

Q3 Dentistry
Georgia-Alexandra Spyropoulou , Konstantinos Vahtsevanos , Konstantinos Antoniades , Eleni Karagergou , Sofia Papadopoulou , Efterpi Demiri
{"title":"Anterolateral thigh harvesting for head and neck reconstruction without Doppler: Risky or not?","authors":"Georgia-Alexandra Spyropoulou ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Vahtsevanos ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Antoniades ,&nbsp;Eleni Karagergou ,&nbsp;Sofia Papadopoulou ,&nbsp;Efterpi Demiri","doi":"10.1016/j.omsc.2023.100304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is used as a workhorse flap for head and neck reconstruction. The most used method to map the perforators nowadays is hand-held Doppler although several more sophisticated techniques have been described. This paper is to investigate whether harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping is safe.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Twenty consecutive patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: A or B. Patients of A group (n = 10) were marked before the operation with the use of a Doppler probe whilst patients of group B (n = 10) were not marked preoperatively using Doppler to detect the perforators. Complications and time of ALT dissection were documented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no statistical difference of complications between the two groups. Mean time of flap harvesting (skin incision up to main pedicle) was approximately 140 min in group A and 165 min in group B (statistically significantly less in group A p = 0.008).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This paper is an indication that harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping, even with hand-held Doppler, does not compromise safety of the procedure although operative time is prolonged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38030,"journal":{"name":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214541923000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) is used as a workhorse flap for head and neck reconstruction. The most used method to map the perforators nowadays is hand-held Doppler although several more sophisticated techniques have been described. This paper is to investigate whether harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping is safe.

Materials and methods

Twenty consecutive patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: A or B. Patients of A group (n = 10) were marked before the operation with the use of a Doppler probe whilst patients of group B (n = 10) were not marked preoperatively using Doppler to detect the perforators. Complications and time of ALT dissection were documented.

Results

There was no statistical difference of complications between the two groups. Mean time of flap harvesting (skin incision up to main pedicle) was approximately 140 min in group A and 165 min in group B (statistically significantly less in group A p = 0.008).

Conclusions

This paper is an indication that harvesting the ALT flap without preoperative mapping, even with hand-held Doppler, does not compromise safety of the procedure although operative time is prolonged.

不经多普勒切除前外侧大腿进行头颈部重建术:是否有风险?
背景:大腿外侧皮瓣(ALT)是头颈部重建的主要皮瓣。目前最常用的射孔定位方法是手持式多普勒,尽管也有一些更复杂的技术。本文的目的是探讨在术前不做定位的情况下摘取ALT皮瓣是否安全。材料与方法将20例患者随机分为A组和B组,A组(n = 10)术前采用多普勒穿刺标记,B组(n = 10)术前不采用多普勒穿刺标记。记录ALT剥离的并发症及时间。结果两组患者并发症发生率无统计学差异。A组皮瓣收获(皮肤切口至主蒂)的平均时间约为140 min, B组约为165 min (A组差异有统计学意义p = 0.008)。结论在术前不做定位的情况下获取ALT皮瓣,即使使用手持多普勒,虽然延长了手术时间,但并不影响手术的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Cases is a surgical journal dedicated to publishing case reports and case series only which must be original, educational, rare conditions or findings, or clinically interesting to an international audience of surgeons and clinicians. Case series can be prospective or retrospective and examine the outcomes of management or mechanisms in more than one patient. Case reports may include new or modified methodology and treatment, uncommon findings, and mechanisms. All case reports and case series will be peer reviewed for acceptance for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信