Physicians’ knowledge about radiation protection of patients during prescription of CT scan procedures in Morocco

Q1 Health Professions
Bouchra Amaoui , Fatima Safini , Laila Lahlou , Mohamed El Fahssi , Sanae Abbaoui , Slimane Semghouli
{"title":"Physicians’ knowledge about radiation protection of patients during prescription of CT scan procedures in Morocco","authors":"Bouchra Amaoui ,&nbsp;Fatima Safini ,&nbsp;Laila Lahlou ,&nbsp;Mohamed El Fahssi ,&nbsp;Sanae Abbaoui ,&nbsp;Slimane Semghouli","doi":"10.1016/j.radmp.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the knowledge and practices of Moroccan physicians in terms of radioprotection of patients when prescribing computed tomography (CT) procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross-sectional study in which a questionnaire with 23 multiple-choice questions was sent to prescribers of CT examinations such as radiotherapists (RMs), other medical specialists (OMSs), general practitioners (GPs) and residents/interns (R/Is). The first eight questions asked about the demographics of the participants, while the remaining questions asked about knowledge of ionizing radiation examinations, doses received, relative risks, and patient radiation safety training.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 223 physicians participated in this survey. Radiation therapists, considered as the reference group, had a better knowledge of irradiating and non-irradiating imaging compared to the other groups (<em>P</em> ​= ​0.003). Thus, 67% of the reference group declared to take into account the number of scans performed by the patient during the last year, unlike the other groups (<em>P</em> ​= ​0.002). Furthermore, the knowledge of the different groups about the risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation was globally low (2%) (<em>P</em> ​= ​0.73). Regardless of their specialties and seniority, only 12% of the participants informed the patient at the time of prescription about the risks of X-rays. Finally, only 21% of the participants declared having had training in radiation protection, with no significant differences between the subgroups (<em>P</em> ​= ​0.832).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results obtained are similar to those reported in previous studies. They show that Moroccan prescribers have a low level of knowledge of the risks associated with CT examinations. Training on patient radiation protection should be included in the initial curriculum of interns and the continuing professional development of physicians should be reinforced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34051,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","volume":"4 1","pages":"Pages 54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Medicine and Protection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555723000072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the knowledge and practices of Moroccan physicians in terms of radioprotection of patients when prescribing computed tomography (CT) procedures.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study in which a questionnaire with 23 multiple-choice questions was sent to prescribers of CT examinations such as radiotherapists (RMs), other medical specialists (OMSs), general practitioners (GPs) and residents/interns (R/Is). The first eight questions asked about the demographics of the participants, while the remaining questions asked about knowledge of ionizing radiation examinations, doses received, relative risks, and patient radiation safety training.

Results

A total of 223 physicians participated in this survey. Radiation therapists, considered as the reference group, had a better knowledge of irradiating and non-irradiating imaging compared to the other groups (P ​= ​0.003). Thus, 67% of the reference group declared to take into account the number of scans performed by the patient during the last year, unlike the other groups (P ​= ​0.002). Furthermore, the knowledge of the different groups about the risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation was globally low (2%) (P ​= ​0.73). Regardless of their specialties and seniority, only 12% of the participants informed the patient at the time of prescription about the risks of X-rays. Finally, only 21% of the participants declared having had training in radiation protection, with no significant differences between the subgroups (P ​= ​0.832).

Conclusions

The results obtained are similar to those reported in previous studies. They show that Moroccan prescribers have a low level of knowledge of the risks associated with CT examinations. Training on patient radiation protection should be included in the initial curriculum of interns and the continuing professional development of physicians should be reinforced.

摩洛哥医生在CT扫描程序处方期间对患者辐射防护的了解
目的评价摩洛哥医生在对患者进行计算机断层扫描(CT)时的放射防护知识和做法。方法采用横断面研究方法,将包含23道选择题的问卷发送给开CT检查处方的医师,如放射治疗师(RMs)、其他医学专家(OMSs)、全科医生(gp)和住院医师/实习生(R/ is)。前8个问题询问了参与者的人口统计数据,而其余的问题询问了电离辐射检查的知识、接受的剂量、相对风险和患者辐射安全培训。结果共有223名医生参与本次调查。与其他组相比,作为参照组的放射治疗师对放射和非放射成像有更好的了解(P = 0.003)。因此,与其他组(P = 0.002)不同,67%的参照组声明考虑了患者在过去一年中进行的扫描次数。此外,不同群体对电离辐射暴露相关风险的了解在全球范围内较低(2%)(P = 0.73)。不管他们的专业和资历如何,只有12%的参与者在开处方时告知病人x光的风险。最后,只有21%的参与者声称接受过辐射防护培训,亚组之间没有显著差异(P = 0.832)。结论所得结果与前人的研究结果基本一致。它们表明,摩洛哥的开处方者对CT检查相关风险的认识水平较低。关于病人辐射防护的培训应列入实习医生的初步课程,并应加强医生的持续专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Medicine and Protection
Radiation Medicine and Protection Health Professions-Emergency Medical Services
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信