Prevalence of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

M. M. Islam, MD Yeasir Yunus, Muhammad Saifullah Akib, Md. Rakibul Iqbal, Mohona Khan
{"title":"Prevalence of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in South Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"M. M. Islam, MD Yeasir Yunus, Muhammad Saifullah Akib, Md. Rakibul Iqbal, Mohona Khan","doi":"10.25133/jpssv312023.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine uptake and coverage in susceptible populations are needed through effective vaccination campaigns to address the COVID-19 pandemic in South Asian countries. We aimed to measure the pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in this regard. Research articles published between January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were searched through Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and the WHO COVID-19 database. The Joanna Briggs Institute (2014) tool for prevalence studies was used to assess data quality. We performed a meta-regression test and a sensitive analysis among the studies and used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to measure the pooled effect estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed concerning vaccine hesitancy, countries, study population, study level, and the time since the first outbreak of the pandemic. A total of 43 studies out of 598 published articles across the eight countries in South Asia were included. The pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was 26.5% (95% CI [22, 31], I2 = 99.59%). Vaccine hesitancy was higher in Afghanistan (37%), Pakistan (33%), and Bangladesh (28.9%); among the general population (29%); at community levels (27.9%); and the duration of time of 1–12 months since the first outbreak in each country (27.5%). Vaccine hesitancy exists in South Asia with different rates among countries, population sub-groups, communities, study- levels, duration of time since the first outbreak, and study population. Therefore, enhancing public awareness of vaccination and vaccine hesitancy is required to prevent future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":85846,"journal":{"name":"Warasan prachakon lae sangkhom = Journal of population and social studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Warasan prachakon lae sangkhom = Journal of population and social studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25133/jpssv312023.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccine uptake and coverage in susceptible populations are needed through effective vaccination campaigns to address the COVID-19 pandemic in South Asian countries. We aimed to measure the pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in this regard. Research articles published between January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were searched through Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and the WHO COVID-19 database. The Joanna Briggs Institute (2014) tool for prevalence studies was used to assess data quality. We performed a meta-regression test and a sensitive analysis among the studies and used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to measure the pooled effect estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed concerning vaccine hesitancy, countries, study population, study level, and the time since the first outbreak of the pandemic. A total of 43 studies out of 598 published articles across the eight countries in South Asia were included. The pooled proportion of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was 26.5% (95% CI [22, 31], I2 = 99.59%). Vaccine hesitancy was higher in Afghanistan (37%), Pakistan (33%), and Bangladesh (28.9%); among the general population (29%); at community levels (27.9%); and the duration of time of 1–12 months since the first outbreak in each country (27.5%). Vaccine hesitancy exists in South Asia with different rates among countries, population sub-groups, communities, study- levels, duration of time since the first outbreak, and study population. Therefore, enhancing public awareness of vaccination and vaccine hesitancy is required to prevent future pandemics.
南亚地区COVID-19疫苗犹豫患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析
通过有效的疫苗接种运动,需要在易感人群中接种和覆盖疫苗,以应对南亚国家的COVID-19大流行。我们的目的是衡量COVID-19疫苗犹豫在这方面的综合比例。通过Medline、PubMed、Cochrane、谷歌Scholar和世卫组织COVID-19数据库检索了2020年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间发表的研究文章。乔安娜布里格斯研究所(2014)的流行病学研究工具被用来评估数据质量。我们对这些研究进行了meta回归检验和敏感分析,并使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型来测量合并效应估计。对疫苗犹豫、国家、研究人群、研究水平和大流行首次爆发以来的时间进行了亚组分析。在南亚8个国家发表的598篇论文中,共有43篇研究被纳入其中。COVID-19疫苗犹豫的合并比例为26.5% (95% CI [22,31], I2 = 99.59%)。在阿富汗(37%)、巴基斯坦(33%)和孟加拉国(28.9%),疫苗犹豫率较高;在普通人群中(29%);在社区一级(27.9%);自每个国家首次暴发以来的持续时间为1-12个月(27.5%)。南亚存在疫苗犹豫,不同国家、人口亚组、社区、研究水平、自首次暴发以来的持续时间和研究人群之间的比例不同。因此,需要提高公众对疫苗接种和疫苗犹豫的认识,以预防未来的大流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书