Efficacy and duration of electro-acupuncture combined with conventional antipsychotics for schizophrenia: A meta-analysis

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Zhao-han Huang, Yuan Fang, Q. Yu, Tong Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and duration of electro-acupuncture combined with conventional antipsychotics for schizophrenia: A meta-analysis","authors":"Zhao-han Huang, Yuan Fang, Q. Yu, Tong Wang","doi":"10.4103/2311-8571.372173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and optimal course time of electro-acupuncture (EA) combined with conventional antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia (SZ) and to provide a basis for its clinical application. Methods: Relevant databases and authoritative websites were retrieved, and references were screened up to May 2021. Literature quality evaluation and data extraction were carried out according to the requirements of Cochrane version 5.1.0, and meta-analysis was conducted using Rav Man5.4 software. Results: In total, 16 randomized controlled trails comprising 1352 patients were selected. Meta-analysis revealed that the observation group showed greater improvements than the control group in total clinical efficacy (P < 0.00001, odds ratio [OR] = 3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [2.51, 4.91]), as well as better effective rate of symptom relief (P = 0.02, MD = 3.08, 95% CI = [1.23, 7.71]), and an improved negative symptom score (P = 0.005, MD = −4.50, 95% CI = [−6.52, −2.48]), positive symptom score (P < 0.0001, MD = −1.41, 95% CI = [−2.25, −0.57]), total score (P = 0.001, MD = 9.25, 95% CI = [13.03, 5.47]), and general psychopathological score (P < 0.0001, MD = −2.30, 95% CI = [−4.18, −0.43]) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the effective rate of adverse reactions (P > 0.05). In the 4–6 weeks following treatment, a significant improvement in all the four components of the PANSS scores was observed in the observation group. Conclusion: The efficacy of EA combined with conventional antipsychotics for SZ is better than that of psychiatric drugs alone. In addition, the effect of a 4-to 6-week treatment course on each outcome index is more significant, and the efficacy is higher.","PeriodicalId":23692,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"212 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2311-8571.372173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and optimal course time of electro-acupuncture (EA) combined with conventional antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia (SZ) and to provide a basis for its clinical application. Methods: Relevant databases and authoritative websites were retrieved, and references were screened up to May 2021. Literature quality evaluation and data extraction were carried out according to the requirements of Cochrane version 5.1.0, and meta-analysis was conducted using Rav Man5.4 software. Results: In total, 16 randomized controlled trails comprising 1352 patients were selected. Meta-analysis revealed that the observation group showed greater improvements than the control group in total clinical efficacy (P < 0.00001, odds ratio [OR] = 3.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [2.51, 4.91]), as well as better effective rate of symptom relief (P = 0.02, MD = 3.08, 95% CI = [1.23, 7.71]), and an improved negative symptom score (P = 0.005, MD = −4.50, 95% CI = [−6.52, −2.48]), positive symptom score (P < 0.0001, MD = −1.41, 95% CI = [−2.25, −0.57]), total score (P = 0.001, MD = 9.25, 95% CI = [13.03, 5.47]), and general psychopathological score (P < 0.0001, MD = −2.30, 95% CI = [−4.18, −0.43]) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the effective rate of adverse reactions (P > 0.05). In the 4–6 weeks following treatment, a significant improvement in all the four components of the PANSS scores was observed in the observation group. Conclusion: The efficacy of EA combined with conventional antipsychotics for SZ is better than that of psychiatric drugs alone. In addition, the effect of a 4-to 6-week treatment course on each outcome index is more significant, and the efficacy is higher.
电针联合常规抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症的疗效和持续时间:荟萃分析
前言:本研究旨在评价电针(EA)联合常规抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症(SZ)的有效性和最佳疗程,为其临床应用提供依据。方法:检索相关数据库和权威网站,筛选截至2021年5月的参考文献。根据Cochrane 5.1.0版本的要求进行文献质量评估和数据提取,并使用Rav Man5.4软件进行荟萃分析。结果:总共选择了16项随机对照试验,包括1352名患者。Meta分析显示,观察组在总临床疗效方面比对照组有更大的改善(P<0.00001,比值比[OR]=3.51,95%置信区间[CI]=2.51,4.91]),症状缓解的有效率也更好(P=0.02,MD=3.08,95%可信区间=1.23,7.71]),阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)中的阴性症状评分(P=0.005,MD=-4.50,95%CI=[-6.52,-2.48])、阳性症状评分(P<0.0001,MD=-1.41,95%CI=[−2.25,−0.57])、总分(P=0.001,MD=9.25,95%CI=[13.03,5.47])和一般精神病理学评分(P<0.001,MD=-2.30,95%CI=[−4.18,−0.43])均有改善。然而,两组的不良反应有效率没有统计学上的显著差异(P>0.05)。在治疗后的4-6周,观察组的PANSS评分的所有四个组成部分都有显著改善。结论:电针联合常规抗精神病药物治疗SZ疗效优于单纯精神病药物。此外,4-6周的疗程对每个结果指标的影响更显著,疗效更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
World Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信