The effect of the Seattle Police-Free CHOP zone on crime: A microsynthetic control evaluation

IF 4.1 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Eric L. Piza, Nathan T. Connealy
{"title":"The effect of the Seattle Police-Free CHOP zone on crime: A microsynthetic control evaluation","authors":"Eric L. Piza,&nbsp;Nathan T. Connealy","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.12570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Nightly confrontations occurred between protestors and officers outside of the Seattle Police Department's (SPD's) East precinct in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder. On June 8, 2020, the SPD abandoned the East precinct in an attempt to calm the situation. Following closure of the precinct, the Capitol Hill Occupation Protest (CHOP) took hold in the surrounding 6-block area. The CHOP occupation lasted until July 1, 2020. Over this time period, CHOP operated as an autonomous zone, with police officers not patrolling and generally not responding to calls for police service within the area. We used the microsynthetic control group method to analyze the effect of CHOP on crime during the 24-day occupation. Results indicate crime significantly increased in the CHOP zone, the encompassing two-block area, and the overall East precinct service area.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The current study found comparatively stronger effects than the general literature on depolicing. The significant crime increase is particularly noteworthy given the short time frame of the CHOP occupation and retreat of police from the area theoretically making it more challenging for crimes to be reported by citizens and/or proactively discovered by officers. This suggests that police abolition, the most extreme form of the police defunding movement, may significantly compromise public safety. Moving forward, a prudent policy solution may be to simultaneously support the evidence-based crime prevention work of police and community-based institutions. Such an approach may achieve currently desired policing reforms without risking crime spikes that can result from drastic reductions of police presence. Wide-scale adoption of evidence-based policing may provide a vehicle for such meaningful, long-term reform.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":"21 1","pages":"35-58"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12570","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Research Summary

Nightly confrontations occurred between protestors and officers outside of the Seattle Police Department's (SPD's) East precinct in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder. On June 8, 2020, the SPD abandoned the East precinct in an attempt to calm the situation. Following closure of the precinct, the Capitol Hill Occupation Protest (CHOP) took hold in the surrounding 6-block area. The CHOP occupation lasted until July 1, 2020. Over this time period, CHOP operated as an autonomous zone, with police officers not patrolling and generally not responding to calls for police service within the area. We used the microsynthetic control group method to analyze the effect of CHOP on crime during the 24-day occupation. Results indicate crime significantly increased in the CHOP zone, the encompassing two-block area, and the overall East precinct service area.

Policy Implications

The current study found comparatively stronger effects than the general literature on depolicing. The significant crime increase is particularly noteworthy given the short time frame of the CHOP occupation and retreat of police from the area theoretically making it more challenging for crimes to be reported by citizens and/or proactively discovered by officers. This suggests that police abolition, the most extreme form of the police defunding movement, may significantly compromise public safety. Moving forward, a prudent policy solution may be to simultaneously support the evidence-based crime prevention work of police and community-based institutions. Such an approach may achieve currently desired policing reforms without risking crime spikes that can result from drastic reductions of police presence. Wide-scale adoption of evidence-based policing may provide a vehicle for such meaningful, long-term reform.

西雅图无警察CHOP区对犯罪的影响:微合成控制评价
乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀后,抗议者和西雅图警察局(SPD)东部分局外的警察之间发生了夜间对抗。2020年6月8日,社民党放弃了东部选区,试图平息局势。在该区域关闭后,国会山占领抗议活动(CHOP)在周围的6个街区举行。CHOP的占领持续到2020年7月1日。在此期间,CHOP作为一个自治区运作,警察不巡逻,通常不回应该地区的警察服务电话。我们采用微合成控制组法分析了CHOP在24天占领期间对犯罪的影响。结果表明,在CHOP区域,包括两个街区区域和整个东区服务区,犯罪率显著增加。目前的研究发现,与一般文献相比,去警务化的影响相对更强。鉴于警察部队占领该地区的时间很短,从理论上讲,警察从该地区撤退,这使得市民举报犯罪和/或警察主动发现犯罪变得更加困难,因此,犯罪的显著增加尤其值得注意。这表明,作为警察撤资运动的最极端形式,废除警察可能会严重损害公共安全。展望未来,一个审慎的政策解决方案可能是同时支持警察和社区机构的基于证据的预防犯罪工作。这种方法可以实现目前期望的警务改革,而不会冒着大幅减少警力可能导致的犯罪激增的风险。大规模采用循证警务可能为这种有意义的长期改革提供一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信