What does students’ recognition of procedural mistakes in the chemistry laboratory tell us?

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Elif Atabek-Yigit, Ahmet B. Senoz
{"title":"What does students’ recognition of procedural mistakes in the chemistry laboratory tell us?","authors":"Elif Atabek-Yigit, Ahmet B. Senoz","doi":"10.1080/1554480X.2021.1975544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Students’ recognition of the common procedural mistakes in the chemistry laboratory was examined in this study. Data were collected from 49 undergraduates studying Science Teaching. A video in which a student is purposefully making common procedural mistakes was shown to the students, and they were asked to recognize the mistakes. A Written Response Form (WRF), Chemistry Laboratory Anxiety Scale (CLAS), Laboratory Equipments Knowledge Form (LEKF), and Calculation Form (CF) were the data collecting tools. Students’ scores from WRF indicated that they could not recognize many mistakes. Correlation analysis was made between students’ scores from recognizing mistakes (WRF) and their CLAS, LEKF, and CF scores. The study’s findings imply that only the feelings towards laboratory work (anxiety in this case) correlated with WRF. When high anxiety students and low anxiety students were examined, it was found that high anxiety students did not recognize some mistakes at all.","PeriodicalId":45770,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2021.1975544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Students’ recognition of the common procedural mistakes in the chemistry laboratory was examined in this study. Data were collected from 49 undergraduates studying Science Teaching. A video in which a student is purposefully making common procedural mistakes was shown to the students, and they were asked to recognize the mistakes. A Written Response Form (WRF), Chemistry Laboratory Anxiety Scale (CLAS), Laboratory Equipments Knowledge Form (LEKF), and Calculation Form (CF) were the data collecting tools. Students’ scores from WRF indicated that they could not recognize many mistakes. Correlation analysis was made between students’ scores from recognizing mistakes (WRF) and their CLAS, LEKF, and CF scores. The study’s findings imply that only the feelings towards laboratory work (anxiety in this case) correlated with WRF. When high anxiety students and low anxiety students were examined, it was found that high anxiety students did not recognize some mistakes at all.
学生对化学实验室程序错误的认识告诉我们什么?
摘要本研究旨在调查学生对化学实验室常见程序错误的认知。数据收集自49名主修科学教学的本科生。研究人员向学生们播放了一段视频,视频中一个学生故意犯了一些常见的程序错误,并要求他们识别这些错误。数据收集工具为书面回答表(WRF)、化学实验室焦虑量表(CLAS)、实验室设备知识表(LEKF)和计算表(CF)。学生在WRF上的分数表明他们不能识别很多错误。对学生的识别错误得分(WRF)与CLAS、LEKF、CF得分进行相关分析。研究结果表明,只有对实验室工作的感觉(在这种情况下是焦虑)与WRF有关。当对高焦虑学生和低焦虑学生进行测试时,发现高焦虑学生根本不认识一些错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedagogies
Pedagogies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信