Sugarcane Yield and Juice Quality as Affected by Harvest Age and Chemical Ripeners in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRONOMY
Netsanet Ayele, Tamado Tana, Philippus Daniel Riekert van Heerden, Kebede W/Tsadik, Yibekal Alemayehu
{"title":"Sugarcane Yield and Juice Quality as Affected by Harvest Age and Chemical Ripeners in Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia","authors":"Netsanet Ayele,&nbsp;Tamado Tana,&nbsp;Philippus Daniel Riekert van Heerden,&nbsp;Kebede W/Tsadik,&nbsp;Yibekal Alemayehu","doi":"10.1007/s40003-023-00664-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chemical ripening is a promising technology at Metahara and Kessem sugarcane plantations where conditions are not optimal for natural ripening in the early and late period of sugarcane processing. However, the harvest age at which sucrose yield could be maximized with application of ripeners has not been established. Thus, field experiments were conducted to determine the effects of harvest age and chemical ripeners on yield and juice quality of sugarcane. The experiments were conducted in the late period (June) harvesting at Metahara, and in the early (October) and late period (June) harvesting at Kessem. A split plot design with three replications was used where the main plot treatments were two sugarcane varieties, viz. B52-298 and SP70-1284, and the sub-plot treatment consisted of combinations of four harvest ages (10, 12, 14 and 16 months) and two ripener treatments [Moddus™ at 250 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup> + Fusilade Forte™ (M + FF) at 25.6 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup> combination sequentially sprayed and unsprayed control]. The results showed significant difference between the varieties for stalk height and stalk weight in early period study at Kessem with variety SP70-1284 being superior as compared to variety B52-298. Furthermore, harvest age and ripener combination significantly affected all yield and quality parameters, while there was a significant cane and sucrose yield response at Kessem at both sites and seasons. The highest cane yield was recorded in the unsprayed 16-month harvest age treatment, while the highest sucrose yield was recorded in the M + FF ripener combination 12-month harvest age treatment in all the studies. The economic analysis showed the highest marginal rate of return and net revenue in the M + FF ripener combination 12-month harvest age treatment and represents the best cane quality management practice for varieties B52-298 and SP70-1284 at these plantations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7553,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40003-023-00664-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemical ripening is a promising technology at Metahara and Kessem sugarcane plantations where conditions are not optimal for natural ripening in the early and late period of sugarcane processing. However, the harvest age at which sucrose yield could be maximized with application of ripeners has not been established. Thus, field experiments were conducted to determine the effects of harvest age and chemical ripeners on yield and juice quality of sugarcane. The experiments were conducted in the late period (June) harvesting at Metahara, and in the early (October) and late period (June) harvesting at Kessem. A split plot design with three replications was used where the main plot treatments were two sugarcane varieties, viz. B52-298 and SP70-1284, and the sub-plot treatment consisted of combinations of four harvest ages (10, 12, 14 and 16 months) and two ripener treatments [Moddus™ at 250 g ai ha−1 + Fusilade Forte™ (M + FF) at 25.6 g ai ha−1 combination sequentially sprayed and unsprayed control]. The results showed significant difference between the varieties for stalk height and stalk weight in early period study at Kessem with variety SP70-1284 being superior as compared to variety B52-298. Furthermore, harvest age and ripener combination significantly affected all yield and quality parameters, while there was a significant cane and sucrose yield response at Kessem at both sites and seasons. The highest cane yield was recorded in the unsprayed 16-month harvest age treatment, while the highest sucrose yield was recorded in the M + FF ripener combination 12-month harvest age treatment in all the studies. The economic analysis showed the highest marginal rate of return and net revenue in the M + FF ripener combination 12-month harvest age treatment and represents the best cane quality management practice for varieties B52-298 and SP70-1284 at these plantations.

埃塞俄比亚中部大裂谷收获期和化学催熟剂对甘蔗产量和品质的影响
化学催熟技术在梅塔哈拉和凯塞姆甘蔗种植园是一项很有前途的技术,在甘蔗加工的早期和后期条件不适合自然催熟。然而,施用催熟剂使蔗糖产量最大化的收获期尚未确定。为此,通过田间试验,确定了采收年龄和化学催熟剂对甘蔗产量和果汁品质的影响。试验分别在梅塔哈拉收获后期(6月)和凯塞姆收获前期(10月)和后期(6月)进行。采用3个重复的分区设计,主区处理为B52-298和SP70-1284两个甘蔗品种,分区处理由4个采收期(10、12、14和16个月)和2个成熟剂处理(Moddus™250 g ha -1 + Fusilade Forte™(M + FF) 25.6 g ha -1组合,依次喷洒和未喷洒对照)组成。结果表明:在凯塞姆试验前期,品种间茎高和茎重差异显著,品种SP70-1284优于品种B52-298;收获期和催熟机组合对所有产量和品质参数均有显著影响,而甘蔗和蔗糖产量在不同地点和季节均有显著的响应。甘蔗产量最高的是未喷施16个月收获期处理,而蔗糖产量最高的是M + FF催熟剂组合12个月收获期处理。经济分析表明,M + FF组合12个月采收期处理的边际收益率和净收入最高,代表了这些种植园中B52-298和SP70-1284品种的最佳甘蔗质量管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The main objective of this initiative is to promote agricultural research and development. The journal will publish high quality original research papers and critical reviews on emerging fields and concepts for providing future directions. The publications will include both applied and basic research covering the following disciplines of agricultural sciences: Genetic resources, genetics and breeding, biotechnology, physiology, biochemistry, management of biotic and abiotic stresses, and nutrition of field crops, horticultural crops, livestock and fishes; agricultural meteorology, environmental sciences, forestry and agro forestry, agronomy, soils and soil management, microbiology, water management, agricultural engineering and technology, agricultural policy, agricultural economics, food nutrition, agricultural statistics, and extension research; impact of climate change and the emerging technologies on agriculture, and the role of agricultural research and innovation for development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信