Michael Drayton’s Early Career: Reconsidering the Petrarchism of Ideas Mirrour (1594)

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
R. Vuillemin
{"title":"Michael Drayton’s Early Career: Reconsidering the Petrarchism of Ideas Mirrour (1594)","authors":"R. Vuillemin","doi":"10.1353/sip.2021.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The title of Michael Drayton’s Ideas Mirrour (1594) has often been seen as encapsulating a Petrarchan and Neoplatonic poetics adopted by most Elizabethan sonneteers and countered or subverted by the most canonical poets. This essay suggests that such an interpretation misrepresents the complexity of Elizabethan sonnet sequences in general and of Drayton’s in particular, reassessing Drayton’s Petrarchism and alleged Neo-platonism as well as revising Thomas P. Roche Jr.’s notion of a widely shared Augustinianism among English sonneteers. I turn away from a vision of Drayton as a belated Spenserian or nostalgic Elizabethan to focus on his early career in the 1590s. More specifically, I insist on the connections between Drayton’s three “Ideas”: Idea: The Shepheards Garland (1593), Ideas Mirrour (1594), and Endimion and Phoebe: Ideas Latmus (1595) to identify a career pattern in the progression from one to the next. In drawing these connections, I argue for a revaluation of the role of the Sidney family as a social and poetic ideal for Drayton in the 1590s.","PeriodicalId":45500,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","volume":"118 1","pages":"70 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/sip.2021.0003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sip.2021.0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract:The title of Michael Drayton’s Ideas Mirrour (1594) has often been seen as encapsulating a Petrarchan and Neoplatonic poetics adopted by most Elizabethan sonneteers and countered or subverted by the most canonical poets. This essay suggests that such an interpretation misrepresents the complexity of Elizabethan sonnet sequences in general and of Drayton’s in particular, reassessing Drayton’s Petrarchism and alleged Neo-platonism as well as revising Thomas P. Roche Jr.’s notion of a widely shared Augustinianism among English sonneteers. I turn away from a vision of Drayton as a belated Spenserian or nostalgic Elizabethan to focus on his early career in the 1590s. More specifically, I insist on the connections between Drayton’s three “Ideas”: Idea: The Shepheards Garland (1593), Ideas Mirrour (1594), and Endimion and Phoebe: Ideas Latmus (1595) to identify a career pattern in the progression from one to the next. In drawing these connections, I argue for a revaluation of the role of the Sidney family as a social and poetic ideal for Drayton in the 1590s.
迈克尔·德雷顿的早期职业生涯:反思思想的彼特拉克主义(1594)
摘要:迈克尔·德雷顿的《思想之镜》(1594)的标题通常被认为是对彼得拉克派和新柏拉图派诗学的概括,这些诗学被大多数伊丽莎白十四行诗作家所采用,但却被大多数权威诗人所反对或颠覆。本文认为,这种解释曲解了伊丽莎白十四行诗序列的复杂性,尤其是德雷顿的复杂性,重新评估了德雷顿的彼得拉克主义和所谓的新柏拉图主义,并修改了小托马斯·p·罗奇关于英国十四行诗中广泛共享的奥古斯丁主义的概念。我不再把德雷顿看成是一个迟来的斯宾塞派或怀旧的伊丽莎白派而是把重点放在他1590年代的早期职业生涯上。更具体地说,我坚持认为德雷顿的三个“想法”之间的联系:“想法:牧羊人花环”(1593),“想法镜子”(1594)和“结局和菲比:想法Latmus”(1595),以确定从一个到下一个的发展过程中的职业模式。在描绘这些联系时,我主张重新评估西德尼家族作为1590年代德雷顿的社会和诗歌理想的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Founded in 1903, Studies in Philology addresses scholars in a wide range of disciplines, though traditionally its strength has been English Medieval and Renaissance studies. SIP publishes articles on British literature before 1900 and on relations between British literature and works in the Classical, Romance, and Germanic Languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信