Emergency surgery in the time of Coronavirus: the pandemic effect.

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine
J. Martellucci, Andrea Damigella, C. Bergamini, G. Alemanno, D. Pantalone, A. Coratti, P. Muiesan, F. Cianchi, P. Prosperi
{"title":"Emergency surgery in the time of Coronavirus: the pandemic effect.","authors":"J. Martellucci, Andrea Damigella, C. Bergamini, G. Alemanno, D. Pantalone, A. Coratti, P. Muiesan, F. Cianchi, P. Prosperi","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08545-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe COVID-19 epidemic became a challenge for Emergency Departments (ED) and a remarkable reduction in surgical emergencies has been widely noticed. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic period in the need of surgical emergencies.\n\n\nMETHODS\nBetween January 1st and May 31st 2020 all the consecutive general surgery emergencies performed by the Careggi University hospital emergency surgery unit were prospectively recorded and compared to the same period of 2019. Demographic and clinical data were recorded and analyzed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe number of surgical procedures decreased only in the month of March 2020 (compared to 2019), while in April the total numer of emergency surgical procedures was similar. Only appendectomy, complicated hernia repair and colonic resection were significantly reduced (40%, 48% and 33% respectively). The number of small intestine excision, cholecystectomy and lysis of peritoneal adhesions remained stable throughout the entire period. No statistically significant differences were found considering age, sex, Emergency Surgery Score, mortality, ICU postoperative admission and time between admission and surgery, even when analyzed with multivariate analysis for every single surgical procedure, suggesting a comparable disease severity and comorbility patterns. Mortality in COVID patients was 25%, compared to 7% of no-covid patients.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe COVID pandemic has caused major changes in daily clinical practice, especially in areas such as Emergency. This has led to a temporary reduction and changes in the flow of patients to the emergency room, with implications also for emergency surgical activities.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08545-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 epidemic became a challenge for Emergency Departments (ED) and a remarkable reduction in surgical emergencies has been widely noticed. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic period in the need of surgical emergencies. METHODS Between January 1st and May 31st 2020 all the consecutive general surgery emergencies performed by the Careggi University hospital emergency surgery unit were prospectively recorded and compared to the same period of 2019. Demographic and clinical data were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS The number of surgical procedures decreased only in the month of March 2020 (compared to 2019), while in April the total numer of emergency surgical procedures was similar. Only appendectomy, complicated hernia repair and colonic resection were significantly reduced (40%, 48% and 33% respectively). The number of small intestine excision, cholecystectomy and lysis of peritoneal adhesions remained stable throughout the entire period. No statistically significant differences were found considering age, sex, Emergency Surgery Score, mortality, ICU postoperative admission and time between admission and surgery, even when analyzed with multivariate analysis for every single surgical procedure, suggesting a comparable disease severity and comorbility patterns. Mortality in COVID patients was 25%, compared to 7% of no-covid patients. CONCLUSIONS The COVID pandemic has caused major changes in daily clinical practice, especially in areas such as Emergency. This has led to a temporary reduction and changes in the flow of patients to the emergency room, with implications also for emergency surgical activities.
冠状病毒时代的紧急手术:大流行的影响。
背景新冠肺炎疫情成为急诊科(ED)面临的挑战,外科急诊的显著减少已引起广泛关注。本研究的目的是评估疫情期间对外科紧急情况的影响。方法前瞻性记录2020年1月1日至5月31日期间,Careggi大学医院急诊外科连续进行的所有普通外科急诊,并与2019年同期进行比较。记录并分析人口统计学和临床数据。结果手术次数仅在2020年3月(与2019年相比)有所下降,而4月的紧急手术总数相似。只有阑尾切除术、复杂性疝修补术和结肠切除术显著减少(分别为40%、48%和33%)。小肠切除术、胆囊切除术和腹膜粘连松解术的数量在整个期间保持稳定。考虑到年龄、性别、急诊手术评分、死亡率、ICU术后入院以及入院与手术之间的时间,即使对每一次手术进行多变量分析,也没有发现统计学上的显著差异,这表明疾病的严重程度和共病模式具有可比性。新冠肺炎患者的死亡率为25%,而无症状患者的死亡率则为7%。结论新冠肺炎疫情已导致日常临床实践发生重大变化,尤其是在急诊等领域。这导致了急诊室患者流量的暂时减少和变化,也对急诊手术活动产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信