Is an Emphasis on Dignity, Honor and Face more an Attribute of Individuals or of Cultural Groups?

IF 2.3 3区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Cross-Cultural Research Pub Date : 2020-12-14 DOI:10.1177/1069397120979571

Peter B. Smith, M. Easterbrook, Y. Koç, V. M. Lun, Dona Papastylianou, L. Grigoryan, C. Torres, M. Efremova, Bushra Hassan, Ammar Abbas, A. H. Ahmad, A. Al-Bayati, Heyla A. Selim, Joel R. Anderson, S. Cross, Gisela Delfino, V. Gamsakhurdia, A. Gavreliuc, Dana Gavreliuc, Pelin Gul, Ceren Günsoy, A. Hakobjanyan, Siugmin Lay, O. Lopukhova, Ping Hu, D. Sunar, M. Texeira, D. Tripodi, P. D. Díaz Rivera, Yvette van Osch, Masaki Yuki, Natsuki Ogusu, C. T. Kwantes, R. Díaz-Loving, Lorena R. Perez‐Floriano, Trawin Chaleeraktrakoon, Phatthanakit Chobthamkit

{"title":"Is an Emphasis on Dignity, Honor and Face more an Attribute of Individuals or of Cultural Groups?","authors":"Peter B. Smith, M. Easterbrook, Y. Koç, V. M. Lun, Dona Papastylianou, L. Grigoryan, C. Torres, M. Efremova, Bushra Hassan, Ammar Abbas, A. H. Ahmad, A. Al-Bayati, Heyla A. Selim, Joel R. Anderson, S. Cross, Gisela Delfino, V. Gamsakhurdia, A. Gavreliuc, Dana Gavreliuc, Pelin Gul, Ceren Günsoy, A. Hakobjanyan, Siugmin Lay, O. Lopukhova, Ping Hu, D. Sunar, M. Texeira, D. Tripodi, P. D. Díaz Rivera, Yvette van Osch, Masaki Yuki, Natsuki Ogusu, C. T. Kwantes, R. Díaz-Loving, Lorena R. Perez‐Floriano, Trawin Chaleeraktrakoon, Phatthanakit Chobthamkit","doi":"10.1177/1069397120979571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares the individual-level and sample-level predictive utility of a measure of the cultural logics of dignity, honor, and face. University students in 29 samples from 24 nations used a simple measure to rate their perceptions of the interpersonal cultural logic characterizing their local culture. The nomological net of these measures was then explored. Key dependent measures included three different facets of independent versus interdependent self-construal, relevant attitudes and values, reported handling of actual interpersonal conflicts, and responses to normative settings. Multilevel analyses revealed both individual- and sample-level effects but the dignity measure showed more individual-level effects, whereas sample-level effects were relatively more important with the face measure. The implications of this contrast are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47154,"journal":{"name":"Cross-Cultural Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"95 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1069397120979571","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-Cultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397120979571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

Abstract

This study compares the individual-level and sample-level predictive utility of a measure of the cultural logics of dignity, honor, and face. University students in 29 samples from 24 nations used a simple measure to rate their perceptions of the interpersonal cultural logic characterizing their local culture. The nomological net of these measures was then explored. Key dependent measures included three different facets of independent versus interdependent self-construal, relevant attitudes and values, reported handling of actual interpersonal conflicts, and responses to normative settings. Multilevel analyses revealed both individual- and sample-level effects but the dignity measure showed more individual-level effects, whereas sample-level effects were relatively more important with the face measure. The implications of this contrast are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

强调尊严、荣誉和面子更多的是个人的属性还是文化群体的属性？

本研究比较了尊严、荣誉和面子等文化逻辑的个体水平和样本水平的预测效用。来自24个国家的29个样本中的大学生使用一种简单的测量方法来评价他们对当地文化的人际文化逻辑的看法。然后探讨了这些措施的法理网。关键的依赖性测量包括独立与相互依存的自我建构的三个不同方面、相关的态度和价值观、对实际人际冲突的处理报告以及对规范环境的反应。多水平分析显示了个人和样本水平的影响，但尊严测量显示了更多的个人水平影响，而样本水平的效应相对来说更重要。讨论了这种对比的含义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cross-Cultural Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

5.00

自引率

8.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Cross-Cultural Research, formerly Behavior Science Research, is sponsored by the Human Relations Area Files, Inc. (HRAF) and is the official journal of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research. The mission of the journal is to publish peer-reviewed articles describing cross-cultural or comparative studies in all the social/behavioral sciences and other sciences dealing with humans, including anthropology, sociology, psychology, political science, economics, human ecology, and evolutionary biology. Worldwide cross-cultural studies are particularly welcomed, but all kinds of systematic comparisons are acceptable so long as they deal explicity with cross-cultural issues pertaining to the constraints and variables of human behavior.